Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/03/2016 in Posts

  1. 3 points
    When I first became aware of this suggested variety I was a little sceptical that it really could be another ‘inverted die’ mistake. Of course there are several established legend error varieties of this type, for example the V/ Inverted A’s seen on the 1860 penny and 1854 Half Penny, also the rare 1861 overdates 8/6 and 6/8, but the positions and distance of the relevant letters on the 1858 penny seemed to make an F/B mistake less plausible. Also the protrusions of the underlying B on the first picture I saw were not entirely convincing. I decided to hold judgement until I could acquire a high grade example; pictures of this coin are now attached. Shot at 120x magnification the top two pictures are the F and B from the actual coin. I have then lassoed (by hand) the bits of B showing under F, highlighted these in yellow, and amended the image in PhotoStudio to 50% transparency……..this is bottom left. The final stage, bottom right, is an overlay of this picture on top of the B of BRITANIAR. It seems to me that the protrusions are a good match, and a strong indication that this is indeed a valid error variety, but I would welcome the views of other members. I have only seen a handful of coins struck from this amended die. If Pete has acquired 3 then I think he has done very well. Perhaps once that ‘Victorian Copper Penny’ book is written he will be able to sell his spares at the same price as say an 1861 6/8!
  2. 2 points
    The 1 pence looks like it has been etched with acid, the unexposed bits had a resist painted on and then the coin placed in a solution of whatever acid will eat away the unprotected parts. left in just long enough to strip away the first few microns.
  3. 2 points
  4. 2 points
    Here is one I recently bought. Again decimal but a nice error, at least I think so.
  5. 2 points
    If the part at the bottom is raised, it's a cud, otherwise possibly a lamination error. I have absolutely no idea what happened to that 1 penny though, I can only guess at a lamination error. if it's genuine that is a stonker. Love the square parts on the obverse!
  6. 2 points
  7. 1 point
    Emboldened bit made me cringe MBE. I'd seriously consider getting a decent cabinet for your coins - Try Peter Nichols they are the best available in my opinion.
  8. 1 point
    Andonstar microscope. Cheap and does the job, cannot recommend it enough. Loads on eBay which is where I got mine.
  9. 1 point
    Superb work alfnail and chingford! it's certainly one heck of an optical illusion that the B looks much bigger than the F. i concede: Penny Boys 1 Everything Else 0
  10. 1 point
    Wouldn't hesitate to agree with that logic. Very strange to have such uniform shapes with lamination errors.
  11. 1 point
    I know I wouldn't mind this in my collection.
  12. 1 point
    Not for me I'm afraid, wrong type of penny
  13. 1 point
    I overlaid several letters, best fit below, Ian Fall has a similar overlay coloured that are probably a little clearer. The B also is the First letter of the next part of the legend, which would fit with the error.
  14. 1 point
    The image doesn't show it well but there should be a very obvious second/stepped rim, similar to the below:





×