Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Leaderboard

  1. mrbadexample

    mrbadexample

    Accomplished Collector

    • Points

      3

    • Content Count

      2,085

  2. Stuntman

    Stuntman

    Sterling Member

    • Points

      2

    • Content Count

      535

  3. Nick

    Nick

    Accomplished Collector

    • Points

      1

    • Content Count

      2,053

  4. cathrine

    cathrine

    Unidentified Variety

    • Points

      1

    • Content Count

      72

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/28/2017 in Posts

  1. 1 point
    Nick
    Yep. It's a fake. 1864 florin die number 64 is a well known wrong'un. A search of this forum will provide plenty of information about these fakes.
  2. 1 point
  3. 1 point
    cathrine
    The 1851 "no dots" halfpenny (P-1534) is much rarer than the 1851 "with dots" variety (P-1535). Since this major difference in die variety is not mentioned in the foregoing discussion, I assume that the recut letters referred to apply to the "with dots" die variety. For the "no dots" variety, all specimens that I've ever seen are dated 1 over 1. For the "with dots" variety, one has to bear in mind that re-punched letters or numerals are are common occurrences for all Victorian copper halfpennies.





×