Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/15/2019 in Posts

  1. Those initials at the bottom are the best clue, but you'd have to follow it. On the other hand, perhaps it rings a bell with Rob?
    1 point
  2. In the early 1980s they went to fortnightly for a while, then reverted back to monthly. I would assume from this that this was their peak sales period, but that fortnightly just didn't work out.
    1 point
  3. Dyslexic as well as an idiot.
    1 point
  4. Also bought this George 4th gaming token, I have about a half dozen in this style now but haven't seen this design before
    1 point
  5. He's after a grand but only going to dispatch it 2nd class letter lol.
    1 point
  6. A lovely new addition, D&H280, the obverse shows some gorgeous tones which I've managed to capture some of in the picture. Carbon spot on the reverse but I can live with that
    1 point
  7. I wonder if they considered going to once a quarter, instead of monthly. Of course, if they had found some means to survive and continue, they'd have experienced a definite renaissance as the internet age got underway.
    1 point
  8. Most in the early seventies were really good 73-74-75- when you look back on it the mag died a really sad and lonely death didn't it
    1 point
  9. Begins with Martin and ends in Platt
    1 point
  10. Very possibly. A receipt for payment is surely evidence of sale, and as I said above, in a shop the item and receipt are simultaneous - thus, if a mistake has been made it's then too late for the seller to retract. Over the internet, that is not the case, and it would appear that the receipt has no legal consequence, as the seller has more time to realise his error, and renege on the sale. In a shop, of course, the possibility of carrying through the error to point of sale is more likely, because the original pricer is unlikely to be the individual on the till.
    1 point
  11. Nice recent pickup A/unc after near 180 years
    1 point
  12. Can it be genuinely described as a mule? There is nothing wrong with using a proof die for currency once the proof run has finished as you would expect to have a perfectly good die that could be used again. You certainly wouldn't deface the fields to produce a 'current' die.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...
Test