|
|
The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com |
|
|
Coinpublications.com
Predecimal.com
Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/21/2020 in Posts
-
4 pointsIt seems that it's socially unacceptable to laugh out loud in Hawaii, so just stick to a low Ha.
-
2 pointsProbably as a he "cancelled all bids" before ending the item. Maybe the earlier cancellation of the high bid was after the bidder requested a cancellation after realising it was a dud, and that triggered (eventually) his ending of the item.
-
2 pointsSorry to disappoint, Paddy, but this can't be an 1846. It is the wrong combination of obverse and reverse - looks like Davies 3+B, and you need 1+A for it to be 1846. I guess it is actually 1876 with a buggered 7. Another date to add to your list, sadly, and increasingly like mine!! 🙁
-
2 pointsOnly one question. Why did someone go to the trouble of plugging it?
-
1 pointHe has relisted it, currently with an opening bid of £1, and no mention of die 3
-
1 pointIf so, the buyer will be in for a severe disappointment. Always best to compare with a verified example of the real thing before you commit yourself to buy anything with a degree of uncertainty attached to it.
-
1 pointAlthough the price is a bit of a giveaway. If it were truly an 1863 die no 3 under date in that higher grade condition, it would already be a lot higher as more experienced collectors realised what it was. In auction it would almost certainly go for probably > £6k, as it would easily be the best of the very small cohort.
-
1 pointJust to confirm it's not genuine, it doesn't have the die flaw by the O of ONE.
-
1 pointNow £255, with eight days still to run. People are mental.
-
1 pointThis shows how challenging a nice collecton of silver threepence coins from Victorias reign can be - not for the faint hearted
-
1 pointI don't think so...I think it's just a surface lamination or even a gouge...it's so totally unconvincing it's hard to imagine anyone considering a successful "doctoring" ! The "3" is not even in the right place. But the price is shocking; let's hope it's the vendor bidding against himself (he can do that without scrutiny because it's a private listing sadly).
-
1 pointEven London Coins have a fairly decent picture of a die number 3. Looks nothing like the one on ebay, unsurprisingly.
-
1 pointI've temporarily added this to my rare penny site as a "non-example" just in case someone looks on there but I guess the people who are bidding on this coin are probably not aware of the site.
-
0 pointsAh, I have managed to get back to my photos and now know why I didn't really want to share this one! Even "fair" is a gross over-grading, and the identification as an 1846 is close to guess work! Here we go anyway - don't laugh!
