Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/17/2021 in all areas
-
Messrs Roettiers, Croker, Pistrucci etc. what say you?
1 point -
I bought one of those 2019 sets (to keep, because I didn't have a 2009 Kew) - so that's good news for me at least, Pete 🙂1 point
-
Yep. It's still cringeworthy though. The continuing infantilisation of something that has no business being infantilised. Bah humbug!1 point
-
And back to the who Still sounds great after all these years1 point
-
My personal assessment and attributions are to categorize them as F-274a variants. Inasmuch as the F-274a is considered to actually be a 6 over higher 6, unlike the F-282a which is clearly a 6 over 8, I consider all the various incarnations of 6 over 6 to be F-274a variants. Again, these are only my thoughts and how I have classified them in my collection..1 point
-
Obverse 51 point
-
That's essentially the NORTH & SOUTH of it....1 point
-
Thanks. It doesn't look quite right compared to the example on Richard's site but obviously it's a lot more worn. The other 4 1861s turned out to be all 7+G, F282 as far as I can tell so nothing exciting there. I didn't have one so the best will fill a gap, and I wanted one to send to the chap who sent me the F269 so he has one of the same date. For a quid each I'm not too distressed.1 point
-
Apparently you are POLES apart....1 point
-
LOL, must be bad weather up your way....I played with some nickel coins previously as there was some debate about the 1923 & 1924 pattern 3d and 1/- coins being only nickel (vs. copper-nickel) alloy. I suppose there is a threshold point as which increasing the copper in the alloy deters the magnetic property....1 point
-
1 point
