Leaderboard

I have known women that have enhanced my relaxed moments

I think the dividing line between collectable and not in restrikes or non-circulating issues are whether original dies were used. Modern ones could be made in China or wherever and cast copies are just that, but Taylor for example actually had the Soho dies, some of which were unfinished when he acquired them in the sale following closure in 1848. We are talking about things that weren't intended for circulation or to deceive, that were struck in small numbers and are part of numismatic history. At no point have they been put forward misleadingly as legal tender. The research has been done and the market has decided that they are collectable. One day, someone will plough through and document the current Chinese output and they too will have their enthusiasts. Probably just a reminder that there is no right or wrong way to collect, rather a reasonable or not price to pay for something.

Unlike women!

Yes, that's a really good way of putting it. I actually very much like them, and already have an R96 & R98. Looking for an R97, and also, eventually, a few of the 1797 restrikes. Of course the first ones weren't produced until about 1862 (according to Peck), and continued for many years henceforth. So much of Taylor's work could never have been presented as fake currency anyway, as that type would already have been demonetised. Even so, as Rob says, there was never any intention to deceive, and everything was done "up front" as it were. Boulton had a great imagination, and some of his productions, especially around 1805, are truly unique.

Yes, if that was done much better, and was cheaper - I'd be up for it! It's true - I haven't left a gap, and if I DID buy a clever fake, I'd have to move everything along one... I wouldn't class a Taylor restrike as a fake - they're in a class of their own. As you and Rob say, he used original dies, warts and all, and sometimes in impossible pairings. It's almost as if the ghost of Boulton had come back to life.

In my collecting sphere, the same could be said for the various proof groats (from 1837, 1853, 1857 and 1862) with anachronistic obverses from later decades. They are “fakes” in a sense, but possibly more valuable than the real McCoy because of their added rarity. On the other hand, high prices for the Maundy masquerading as key date 3d are a case of the market having imperfect knowledge - which I expect will correct.