Chris Perkins

Clocks have changed, but if the time the forum displays to you is incorrect, you'll have to go to 'My Controls' and then to 'Board Settings' to make it right again!

I know. I knew about your post an hour before you made it, as I had not adjusted my head yet!

Have a look in the technical area...

Ok, let me explain.... Sylvester is an expert member because like he said, he did (and still does) add valuable accurate replies to questions posted on the forum. He also knows his area very well, so I manually upgraded him to an 'Expert Member'. And you're right, perhaps it's about time I added some new expert members, Geoff particularly. There is a basic scale that you climb dependant on how many posts you have made. But I do the odd thing manually, because I can, and it's much more fun. When a member is 'Validating' it means that they have not yet confirmed their email address. All new members get an email, and have to respond to it before they are a proper member. That's an automatic forum thing, it does not rely on my input.

Well done William!

Lustre is the shiny like new appearance that all new coins have when new and un touched. Coin collectors and dealers can easily tell the difference between a coin posessing original lustre and an aftificial polished coin. As you know, once the original lustre has faded, it can never be brought back. That 1963 Threepence has about full original lustre, and original lustre always tends to look about that kind of colour on threepences of EII. Although on some early George VI coins it often a different hue. It's difficult to show you in a scan, but over time if you get a few full original lustre threepences from reputable dealers (like me for example ;-)) then you'll soon learn what they should look like. As they are normally not expensive and normally not that widely collected (compared to other types), I would think it unlikely that your threepences have been polished. Post pics of them, and we'll see.

I've emailed her, she's usually very busy.

Avatar instructions by Bob: http://www.predecimal.com/forum/index.php?...ct=ST&f=30&t=41

My web/db hosts have informed me that the SQL server will be down for an upgrade, 2am - 5am on March 31st. This will affect just the forum. The rest of the website will behave normally. As most of us are on GMT or European time, and are unlikely to be online between those times, hopefully it will go un-noticed.

People come and go, I think he'll be back. Actually, I must send a mass email via the forum software just to remind people we're here, and impress them with the forum statistics. I think that should help bring people back that may have forgetten they registered.

Well you never know, perhaps the odd American/Australian, I have no idea what the time differences are.

Oh yes, Geoff knows everything ;-) Although perhaps even Geoff may have a problem with a banknote...I don't think he's into those.

I think it sounds contemporary (c 1850 - 70) and it sounds like it features Queen Victoria and all her children. I would think it's unlikely to be modern because of the 'Empress of India' title. I know that her children married into all of those Royal European families and as the fact that is no longer very significant today, again leads me to believe that it is contemporary. Perhaps Geoff is familiar with it?

Perhaps it was given out in the 60's to mark 100 years since Nova Scotia became part of Canada. I'm pretty sure I could put a rough date on it from the style and quality if I could see a picture.

Well isn't that interesting, a British note with some kind of Arabic (unless i'm very much mistaken) counter stamping. I have never seen one, and have no idea exactly where it was used. I have little to do with notes, so that isn't suprising.

I wish my hair was still that thick! It's just as long, if not longer than Dee Snider of Twisted Sister, but unfortunatley it's receeding and I'm having trouble holding my dignity. Luckily when I do my monthly radio programme the webcam in the studio is mounted behind me!

Always assume that it's common enough for no-one to care! Even if it's very rare, perhaps one of only 100 made, you still need a healthy demand for it to be worth anything more than curiosity value. I'm sure there would be a small demand in Canada, particularly Nova Scotia, but I can't imagine it to be the kind of item that collectors cannot live without. And of course the condition will play the most important part. In mint condition with full lustre i'm sure it will be highly collectable. But then, I could be wrong, because I am in no way involved with the Canadian scene.

Then perhaps it is a medal, commomorating the entrance of Nova Scotia as a proper part of Canada. I think that is probably very likely. So perhaps it is some kind of medal, and not a coin at all!

I can't find anything that matches your description in the Canadian sections of Krause World coins or Krause North America. Perhaps it is some kind of merchants token, or even a forgery attempt. I don't have a great deal of experience with Canadian coins.

Probably because it's a funny URL with ?'s and php extentions.

Daniel, Make a scan of it and send it to Richard Varnham through www.coinsforsale.co.uk. I sometimes think that what he doesn't know about hammered coins, simply isn't worth knowing! Be nice to him, he'll help you quicker if you want to sell it!

It all depends on how much someone would pay for it. I suppose I'd probably price it at a Fiver, but you never know it could go crazy on the open ebay market. I'd be please to give it a go for you with my ebay id if you want.

Yeah, the coins rubbish, but how much for the picture?! (I don't know if the coin really is rubbish, that was a joke!)

Hmm, that is bad. Just like the 1821 Half Crown I had a while back. You'll probably find the pin parts have been put on with silver, so you have very little chance of getting them off without leaving horrible stains or even worse behind. If it's solder or lead, they'll come off maybe even with a soldering iron, but you'll still end up with stains left behind.

I think you should re photograph/scan it, either the forum software has a problem or the image is corrupt.