Peckris 2

R over R could most likely be a repair, i.e. the letter being repunched into the die due to wear/infill or similar. However, there are cases where the die was wrong to start with, is repunched, and quite possibly these might be classed as varieties. For example, there are some 1882 pennies where the first 1 in the date (done by Heatons of Birmingham remember, not by the Mint) is slanted ("retrograde") and was repunched before striking - this is regarded as a variety though possibly not collected by many.

AU-50 is ... what exactly? A typical nonsense USA grade amounting to probably no more than VF.

the reverse is IOVIS (Jove = Jupiter) rather than OVIS (sheep)!

I gave up Netflix ages back, I just use Amazon Prime nowadays.

I'd say EF myself. "I can imagine loads are around in VGC being kept as a "Ooooooooooh this will be worth loads in years to come!?!" so not expecting a huge value on it...." There were certainly collectors back then, but tended to collect hammered and early milled. Even by 1926 (the date of Spink's Milled Coinage) coins of Edward VII and later were considered too modern to be of interest, and 1887 collectors or even members of the public would have put them aside purely as mementoes, no thought they would be worth anything in years to come. In that condition I'd rate it about £40+ if the colour is good (not what the photo shows).

As the square colons are both consistent and global, they're clearly not accidental. In the absence of any knowledge from forum members, Michael Gouby would be your next port of call.

Perhaps "shelf" was AI's interpretation of what Arabia was standing on?

I don't believe there was a Roman goddess with 'Shelf' in her name!!

If I had to make a semi-educated guess, I'd say it could be a crude provincial imitation of an official Roman denarius.

You want to talk to @1887jubilee who knows more about the 1887 JH coinage than anyone I've ever met.

He would have said something like "I remember the old mismatics under Obama - they were rubbish, fake."

Have you given up your market stall?

Having owned couple of acid bathed coins I agree with Rob. Acid doesn't shear off the main design leaving the original thickness - it attacks on all axies, leaving a much thinner coin with the elements of all the original design still clear enough to see, including the legend.

Maybe it was just me, but many of the images did seem almost identical. I didn't complain, but then you made the remark about a lack of responses, so I just theorised about why that might be? Good luck anyway

I think that must be it.