Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Peckris 2

Coin Hoarder
  • Posts

    3,572
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    169

Peckris 2 last won the day on May 7

Peckris 2 had the most liked content!

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    SW England
  • Interests
    See Peckris...
    Steely Dan! (added to see if I can edit my profile).

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Peckris 2's Achievements

Collaborator

Collaborator (7/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated
  • Reacting Well
  • Very Popular
  • First Post

Recent Badges

2.4k

Reputation

  1. The 'compelling reason' is whether there's a currency version of the proof coin (e.g. the shilling) or whether the 1927 exists only as a proof, e.g. the threepence.
  2. Looks like a cud?
  3. Wow. I've seen the "original" (which you have?) and have always assumed - correctly or not - that it's a proof or pattern created to test the actual true non-mule type that would be seen in 1927. By the way, D+d cannot be a mule, unlike the actual 1926ME - it's what the 26ME WOULD have been if they hadn't been in such a hurry to 1) get the small supply of 1926 pennies where they were unexpectedly needed, and 2) were fully resourced supervising the changeover to the Modified Effigy for all denominations, plus preparing the new reverses for 1927.
  4. Seriously? Or joking? If you really have, are you up for selling one of them?
  5. I would say poor strike, as the lettering on the garter is perfect, and that's among the first areas to wear. Difficult to grade without seeing in hand, but I would say the second one is AUNC.
  6. I never logout so can't comment on that. However if I try to see messages or notifications, it just spins forever without letting me in to see anything. Also, I can't seem to 'Like' posts - there's just a warning message about 'reacting to this content'.
  7. I'm not an expert on the Anne pattern farthings!
  8. That's supposed to be silver??
  9. Sorry to burst your bubble Paddy, but I'm almost certain from the pictures that it's NOT a recessed ear.
  10. The light striations in the obverse fields indicate it might well have been wiped or cleaned in the past. As for polishing - is the mirror finish only in the fields but not the raised design (difficult to tell from those pictures)? If yes, then not polished, but if shiny all over then it most likely has been.
  11. His last name wasn't Kuryakin by any chance?
  12. Ok, but you did say "the US stole the silver from the people as did the UK earlier"
  13. You'll have to be more specific - this topic is 13 years old!
  14. That's exactly what I'm referring to.
  15. Difficult one. The obverse looks good - VF I'd say - but I do have some problems with the reverse, which looks somewhat too detailed for a coin of this grade. Having said that, this type did have a wider/thicker/more protective rim on the reverse compared to the obverse, so it may be kosher. If it is, then you have a very nice coin.
×
×
  • Create New...