|
The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com |
|
-
Content Count
3,247 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
150
Peckris 2 last won the day on February 18
Peckris 2 had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
2,156 ExcellentAbout Peckris 2
-
Rank
---
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
SW England
-
Interests
See Peckris...
Steely Dan! (added to see if I can edit my profile).
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Pictures of said coins would not only be appreciated, but are a must!
-
Welcome to the forums You can always ask here for advice, especially about where to buy from, and what to get. What are your main interests?
-
Creating those historic prices was a right bit of hard work! So I've only done it for coins in my collection, but luckily I've got all the relevant Seaby/Spinks for the years listed.
-
I created my own database set of tables using FileMaker Pro - this is just four of the tables showing one of the coins:
-
Stuff to Make Us Laugh
Peckris 2 replied to Madness's topic in Nothing whatsoever to do with coins area!
wouldn't be a joke in America where they pronounce it ‘booey’ not ‘boy’! -
there's a hammered forum here
-
my best guess - and that's all it is - is that they might have been an attempt to try and resolve all the problems caused by conversion from large thick copper to smaller thin bronze. The sheer number of varieties that occur between 1860 and 1862 shows the scale of the issues they had, the repairs needed, and the huge number of dies involved.
-
the 1806 is a halfpenny not penny - but quite common in that grade and not worth expensive treatment. if you didn't mind the resulting retoning (paler) you could immerse overnight in balsamic vinegar which would dissolve the verdigris into darker patches. not to be done on a more valuable coin of course
-
Minor GB Penny Queries - Etched 1860 ?, Lower 90 in 1890
Peckris 2 replied to The Bee's topic in Free for all
if anything at all it might be a 6 … or a cud -
that is alarmingly convincing for a repro
-
Florins, Shillings and Misc .... on going sort out.
Peckris 2 replied to Citizen H's topic in Free for all
the 1929 is a florin not a shilling - as you can see from the reverse! -
That's long overdue, but how could it be done?
-
To give just one example : Satin numbers (John Jerraims?) which are assigned by one expert to his post-Freeman observations of new varieties. However, we then have to have Peck, Freeman, Gouby, Satin, numbers. It does make life confusing but what other way is there?
-
Ok, I take that point, but… 1. it’s an obverse / reverse combination unknown on circulation pennies and therefore surely desirable? 2. it could very strongly be argued that NONE of the 1933 pennies was intended for circulation. Nevertheless an incredible collection.
-
Well, that is a pretty awesome collection, and yes I'm envious! Can I make two corrections and an observation on what I've seen so far? 1. The mintage figure for the 1869 only accounts for all pennies minted in that year. An unknown but significant number of these were dated 1868. 2. OMNIUM does not mean a long life - it’s part of OMNIUM BRITANNIARUM meaning “(ruler) of all the Britons”, OMNIUM meaning “of all”. 3. One penny that you may still be lusting after is the ?proof 1926ME that has the non-mule, i.e. 1927, reverse, of which I believe only 1 is known?