Coinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates. |
The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com |
Predecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information. |
-
Content Count
3,222 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
148
Peckris 2 last won the day on October 23 2024
Peckris 2 had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
2,137 ExcellentAbout Peckris 2
-
Rank
---
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
SW England
-
Interests
See Peckris...
Steely Dan! (added to see if I can edit my profile).
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
There are also scarce varieties in 1888 and 1889 where the second I of VICTORIA is missing part of the upper serif (die infill) making it look like a 1. Only significantly more valuable in higher grades.
-
Minor GB Penny Queries - Etched 1860 ?, Lower 90 in 1890
Peckris 2 replied to The Bee's topic in Free for all
Good condition but - unless it’s the photo? - it may have been polished. By the way, PENNY is on the reverse, not obverse which is the side with the monarch’s portrait. -
The penny ha’penny is a currency, not a Maundy, coin.
-
Surely both coins have had the I of FID repaired? They both have a pronounced curve underlying the left hand side of the upright, which can't be an aspect of the font I'd have thought. Yes I agree about the die flaw in relation to the date of strike, so it would definitely seem to be two dies. That would point to the punch used - not the master - having the flaw? The top coin - being later - could also have a slightly more worn die, which would account for the difference in the F, which can also be seen on the D as well.
-
This is the halfcrown reverse - the design (like the shilling) is a bit of a dog’s dinner, but this proof makes it look quite good.
-
The main difference that I can see - which would account for the flaw being in slightly different places - is that the I on the second example appears to be a bit higher than the first, which can also be seen in relation to the underlying character beneath it, the bottom of which protrudes. It looks as if the I was repunched TWICE.
-
I'd like a copy too, please
-
Alice Walker? I thought she was from Luther?
-
Let's See Your Copper Coins, Tokens, Or Medals!
Peckris 2 replied to brg5658's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
I did the same - but when I went to cancel they asked me choose “why” … then extended my free trial for another 30 days! And again - I think I got 3 months free altogether. -
Welcome to the forums H
-
Minor GB Penny Queries - Etched 1860 ?, Lower 90 in 1890
Peckris 2 replied to The Bee's topic in Free for all
I've been wary of 1907 since I saw a reader’s survey in Coin Monthly in 1969 where a large number of ‘varieties' were listed, all featuring the digit 7 and nothing else! They never made it into even the Check Your Change booklets. -
Minor GB Penny Queries - Etched 1860 ?, Lower 90 in 1890
Peckris 2 replied to The Bee's topic in Free for all
A real 1865/3 doesn't look anything like that, sorry. -
Penny Acquisition of the week
Peckris 2 replied to Paulus's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
I would doubt it, for the simple reason that an F would still have its bottom serif. My thought is that it's either die damage or a slight misstrike. -
Minor GB Penny Queries - Etched 1860 ?, Lower 90 in 1890
Peckris 2 replied to The Bee's topic in Free for all
It may appear to be F (or E) over B but please note it's actually B over F/E as it's 'BRITT'. This may be something to do with the way they did the repair. -
It's coming up "Lot not found "?