Peckris 2

I've a few coins like that - always on one face only. I don't see how it could be mint damage? I always taken it to be post-issue damage.

I don't dispute any of that, but what does it have to do with your crazy "extremes of wokery" phrase?

I've absolutely no idea what you mean by "extremes of wokery that are undermining the Western world's entire ethos"

seems to be working ok for me

The same Euros that the women actually won?

Quite. When did the men last reach a World Cup final? oh yes - 1966.

To be honest, that's how I interpreted it as well. I can see how another view is possible - i.e. 'a woman's place is in the home', but that's not how I saw it.

Superb 1904, which is REALLY difficult in top grade. 1893 is only difficult compared to the previous 5 or 6 years which are not hard to find.

kqwakk off...

Another Scottish one... "Would ye like a chocolate digestive or a meringue?" "No, you're nae wrang - I'd love a chocolate digestive"

yes, I was hit by a paywall too. I wouldn't subscribe to the non-dom billionaire far right BArclay Brothers anyway.

Are you kidding? I had a Triumph Herald that was 80 horse power. That's 80 horses given a new job for just one car!

When I make a booking at Cote Brasserie, they always put +44 where I have to enter my phone number, even though both they and I are in the UK.

What's of equal concern is that the last edition of CCGB was only available in print, there was no Kindle edition. I find it very difficult to use print books and rely on there being digital versions. Was there any particular reason for that?

I think also that especially with 6d's, they are far more protected by their rims than 2/6's and 2/-'s.

The world of vinyl collectors is no different. A slightly battered and scratched first pressing of Floyd's 'Piper At the Gates of Dawn ' is still apparently worth more than a slightly later pressing in mint condition where the ONLY difference is that the first doesn't have the words "File under Popular" on the reverse foldback of the sleeve. Sigh.

definitely NOT a normal 1887 6d!

Agreed. It's AVF/VF+ and as I say CuNi coins are usually no better than F after 15 years.

Yeah, but I don't want to download something just to look at it - a standard link or an inline picture is much preferable.

This is the currency example - as you can see it seems to have had limited circulation; CuNi halfcrowns reached that grade in only a few years.

that's the FRITTER variety, only issued in Scotland...

Perhaps your example is a Taylor restrike, but @Rob would know whether that's possible from the die(s) in question.

The 1953 plastic set as well - about £5 back then, and you needn’t pay much more now. It's weird how 1953 was considered a 'scarce year' back then, with no-one apparently realising that millions put coins aside in the first year of a new monarch.

What I think you're seeing is almost entirely the result of photography - the second slightly less precise focus than the first and third - and also the lighting used. You should also see that - unlike when a coin is scanned not photographed - those 3 pictures each show the coin in a slightly different plane; the second example in particular seems to show that the plane is tilted with the head closer to the camera than the bust. The scratches on the first are incuse not raised, and therefore not die scratches.

"Excuse me, sir, did you print this yourself by any chance? I think you'd better come down the station to help us with our enquiries..."