Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Peckris 2

Coin Hoarder
  • Content Count

    3,296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    155

Everything posted by Peckris 2

  1. Peckris 2

    More Pennies

    I'm no expert, but I think the main drawback is the use of both the circular kaleidoscope graphic AND the photographic colourful interior. If you used either but not both, it would be a huge improvement?
  2. Peckris 2

    More Pennies

    Unlike the obverse (which COULD be a proof) that reverse obviously isn't. Do we know the process by which coins were bronzed, and if via a treated die, could that have been used for a few currency pieces?
  3. Peckris 2

    More Pennies

    I didn't know that either. It would be great to see pictures of an example or two.
  4. Peckris 2

    Ebay's BEST Offerings

    Just specify the pixel count you want after you've cropped. Then you can get the pictures the same size, though the slight difference above isn't an issue for me!
  5. Impressive research! My conclusion would be that you could generate more interest if you were able to separate true varieties from Mint sloppiness (cuds, graininess, wearing dies). I feel collectors would more interested in the former than the latter (which as you've recgnised yourself, there are very few disciples of),
  6. Peckris 2

    More Pennies

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Victorian-1862-Penny-In-Good-Collectable-Condition-R63-/325160503448?hash=item4bb5138898%3Ag%3Ak-EAAOSw7A1iY93V&nma=true&si=Rxbv5INqUmg1Ders9n0juMr1c2k%3D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
  7. My own estimation is that it's scoring - if graffiti I can't make out anything that makes sense.
  8. Peckris 2

    Grading has gone to shit

    AU - but nothing special, a bit shabby in fact. Perfectly average, I used to sell those for £1 and there weren't many takers.
  9. Peckris 2

    Test of 1869 6d

    Wants me to sign in to AOL where I don't have an account, nor want one.
  10. Peckris 2

    1981 10 Pence Uncirculated, How Rare or Common?

    OMG. How many coins in it? Well, sort of... if I'm right, that's the standard obverse used in most years. However, most? of the 1970 proofs use the scarce obverse from 1956 and 1968 where I of DEI is to a space and the rim is wider
  11. I don't need to look very far. As someone who has used Photoshop extensively, I'd estimate that any combination of Unsharp Mask, Smart Sharpen, and / or High Pass filters have been used on that image. As a picture of a genuine coin I'd always go with the London Coins image. The blue is a joke. Reminds me of nothing so much as Coin Monthly's Year Book images at the head of each type in the Blue Pages - the isolation of the main design, legend, and rim, with the fields just a blank blue. But they weren't selling coins, just illustrating the different types.
  12. Peckris 2

    1953 Farthing

    That definitely looks like a new 1953 reverse, presumably from a VIP set?
  13. Really? "Just photography "? Even Photoshop's unsharp mask doesn't paint in lines that aren’t there to begin with.
  14. From the two stains (coincidentally botth adjacent to different I A ), it's obviously the same coin. What I don't understand is that there is flattening of the hair above the ear on the LCS picture, but the Atlas picture shows all hair strands - especially the 1st and 3rd below the ribbon - which don't look retouched.
  15. Peckris 2

    1981 10 Pence Uncirculated, How Rare or Common?

    I think you can probably ignore the mintage figures. This was the final year of the large 10p's, outside the BU and proof sets. My thought is that the Mint overestimated demand and minted far more than ever got issued; possibly a large proportion of the strike was melted down? Michael Gouby has a couple of high grade currency examples for sale at high prices. Certainly, you don't see 1981s offered for sale otherwise, so they are presumably much rarer than the mintage suggests. Other rarities include the very rare 1983 NEW PENCE 2p, and supposedly recent 50p's such as Kew Gardens (not as rare as thought, really), the 2012 Olympic 'swimmer' 50p with the waves across the swimmer's face, the 2008 'no date' 20p though again, its rarity is exaggerated. I don't think the 1981 10p is possibly as rare as those, but it's telling that the ones on sale on eBay are all proofs (even the one described as BU UNC) and cost between £15 and £18, which is far more than proofs of other years.
  16. Peckris 2

    Dragonflies

    A great April and May - I rarely ever left the grounds here, but I was out in them nearly every afternoon.
  17. Peckris 2

    Confederate $20 Bill

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the pound originally a pound weight of silver?
  18. It's not certain!! Apparently Schrodinger might still live there. Or he might have died. One or the other.
  19. Peckris 2

    Russians

    I believe iOS 15 will translate from one language to another by voice, then translate the reply back to the first language? I'm sure I saw it somewhere.. Here: https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/iphone/iphd74cb450f/ios
  20. Peckris 2

    DNW Hammered Prices

    Makes my upgrade from a forum member - EF with gorgeous toning - seem a real bargain!
  21. Sorry, but if we are going to debate on this level, then I feel I must stop. But before I leave it, I'll just say that in Corbyn's case - in the irtually impossible scenario that his wife converted from socialism to become a Tory - then Corbyn couldn't be held to account. But for the reasons I won't repeat again, it's not the same in Sunak's case. If you can't see that, then as I say we are going round in circles and I don't have the energy to keep repeating myself. Sorry.
  22. Not at all. I'm holding both morally responsible for each other.
×