The Bee

Hi Richard Here is what I thought might be 1905 small "0." The "0" does look smaller. Great to get your thoughts Very Best Regards

Hi Apologies for troubling the list so soon. Having read through Secret Santa's Penny Varieties, I decided to be a bit methodical and work through all of my Victorian pennies, to see if I had anything variety wise which had escaped me so far. I was following up searching for different date widths for 1889 - 1893 pennies and so far checked 1889 - 1892 - sadly they all look the same I did however find while sorting out the pennies a 1860 penny where the date on the reverse has the appearance of being etched in - so you just have outline of the date, I assume its an odd form of damage, as I can make out the same effect on BRITT REG, the coin has been shined (by a previous owner) and is in terrible condition so it doesn't photograph that well - but great to get your thoughts Also thought I'd share a 1890 Penny where the 90 is slightly lower than the 18 - I'd not noticed it before my assumption being that its probably fairly common And I wondered what years you would recommend I should check for "date widths" aside from 1877 and 1889-92 ? Thank you for your help ! Very Best Regards Richard

Apologies Peckris 2, my typo, I should have said reverse ! There are lots of nicks and scratches. Then yes, I suspect at some point after it came out of circulation it went into a collection and had a polish and a lot of the original patina has been lost. My runner up is below

Very pleased with Crowns and another 1849 Florin that was included in the lot - But this is probably my favourite for the week. It is an upgrade to my 1861 QV Penny (worse than many others) , with a possible repair to the second N in Penny on the obverse

Hi Martin, Many thanks for the feedback, that's really good news, a new one for my Farthing trays It was the previous owner who had paid (I assume) $70 I have retained all my different QV penny die clashes along with different widths etc in my penny trays. Whilst they are nothing extra (seem to crop up all the time), they are interesting Best I think I've seen was I think one of Richard's on another post - quite stunning Very Best Regard

1865 Farthing "Die Crack in Front of Britannia" Late last year I bought a lot of halfpennies and farthings (including the E/F over B halfpenny). As I'm wrapping Edward VII's pennies, I pulled out one of the Farthings for a closer look and then left it ! The description is G.B. Farthing 1865 EF Die Crack in Front of Britannia $70. Had a look - at first glance it didn't look like a typical die crack ? Could it be damage to the reverse die ? Very Best Regards

Hi Richard I've certainly be interested in a copy of the scans please Below is what I thought might be the small 0 1905 - another circulated penny - of course I could be wrong ! Very Best Regards

Well, I did as much as I could manage on 1907 , I found 10 (or at least I think I found 10) and then bundled all the rest of the 1907's away. I do remember buying coin monthly occasionally from my local WH Smith's, I was collecting Crown's and Half Crowns in the very early 1990's, so (assuming 1907 hasn't completely confused me) was probably around then. Very Best Regards

They are a nice team though - I put a few bids in and had the feedback that my bids were all at the auctioneers discretion. So somewhere between the lost hope and no hope !! Very Best Regards

There is quite a bit of general guidance, but the focus seems to be 2nd hand clothes (Vinted), 2nd hand Furniture, clearing individual items from your attic etc. Selling online & HMRC | UK Seller Centre Probably best to give HMRC a call , they are usually pretty helpful, though it might be a 30 minutes wait to speak to someone ! Very Best Regards [May start recycling some of my numerous "duplicates" especially decimal which I pick up with pre decimal and don't collect]

Many thanks Peckris2 , No problem at all, I think it's just a worn damaged coin. Would be interesting to see if there was anything on the 1863 penny with the spec ! Started on Edward VII pennies today - working through David Groom's book - Identification of British 20th Century Bronze Coin Varieties . 1907 is proving quite a challenge (does the 7 point to left right middle or to the tooth) Very Best Regards

1900 Penny with "9" aligned on the tip of the tail rather than at the top Something for a murky Saturday. Might be slightly uncommon ? I think for all my other 1900 pennies the date is aligned at the top !

Many thanks Richard , I my mistake, I had assumed the gouge was the thing and the odd 8 shape, was somehow damage ! Have you seen other examples from 1892 ? [Assume the 1863's are all damage - did think there was possibly something sticking out to the left of the spec] Very Best Regards

Apologies the images above ended up in the wrong order - the top image is the 1863 ? 1865 ?? The next two are the 1863 with the spec on it ! Very Best Regards !

Hope everyone had a good Christmas and New Year I have had two weeks holiday (unheard of for me) which among other things allowed me that time to sort out and weed my penny trays. Having done that I just wanted to share some images from 1863 and 1863 [?] and 1892 The first two are the same coin. I noticed that there was a spec of something under the date. It looked like damage, but on zooming in (2nd picture) did wonder if there something hiding? Its a tolerable 1863 ! The second very worn penny I think is 1863, but wondered if it might be an 1865 over 3 that has suffered a bit ? Again could just be damage - Any thoughts ? Last one from 1892 looks like slight doubling of the linear circle Very Best Regards and best of luck collecting in 2025

1870 Penny E in ONE and 1861 Halfpenny Many thanks for all the above its has been really help. My example of the halfpenny (E over or under B etc) shows some wear and has been circulating (you can only just make out the lower limb of the E, the end of which crosses the B just under halfway up). The other examples (referenced in the link above) which survived in better shape might be more decisive Managed to sort l my pennies through to 1894 and weed out all the many duplicates (which I had piled in hopes that they might fill a gap) earlier than I expected. Which gave me time to have another look at that E in ONE from the 1873 penny. At first glance it looked as if there might have been a repair, but on closer inspection the lower limb of the E looks damaged and I don't think its anything more than a damaged E. I also had another look at the other 1861 halfpenny (above) again on closer inspection it looks like damage of some kind (both images are below) When sorting out the penny trays I have used Mr Gouby's book (the British Bronze Penny) along with Richard's web pages (probably been another 1,000 views by me!) to identify the correct (best I can) Obverses and Reverses Apologies but I had a couple of minor queries as a result and wondered if anyone might be able to assist ? In 1874 the Royal Mint "narrow date" pennies were mainly reverse "j" with a few "ja", and then in 1875 the Royal Mint narrow date pennies were reverse "ja" only. There are several differences between j and ja noted. The most obvious one (for me) being Britannia's hair. For j long hair and for ja much shorter hair. The second difference the angle of Britannia's helmet. I wondered if anyone has spotted any other differences in Britannia's hair, either on the j or ja reverse for either date ? (had a bit of ambiguity with my reverse j hair) And my second query, while working through The British Bronze Penny, there are examples given of slight doubling of the linear circle in similar places by the date e.g. 1874 H and 1875. Working through my trays I found a few possible examples including 1875 and 1892. I made me wonder whether the effect of slight doubling might have been a set up / mechanical issue ? Very Best Regards

Many thanks again for your help I will return the halfpenny to the discard pile ! I will have a closer at the Penny. I am sure you are a both right, it is most likely damage, probably random abrasion. Peckris is absolutely right, it can't be an F as there isn't a trace of a serif, even an upside down L wouldn't fit (had one been available) Very Best Regards

Many thanks Martin, that makes complete sense. The only example in Mr G's book, from the very rare reverse, had the date lower and it just didn't look the same Hope its okay to share a couple of other photos. The first is the ONE from the reverse of an 1873 penny. I wondered if the E had been repaired with an F, or whether there was just damage to base of the E ? (nice penny whether damaged or repaired) The second is an "odd" looking 1854 Halfpenny from my discards pile. I had found really nice minor repairs (I liked them anyway !) to another 1854, the letters repaired being DEI GRA. You can see the "I" and GRA) in the last image which I had overlooked previously, 1854 being (judging by the number I have found) an extremely common date, and had another look at "odd one" I wondered if it was damage (maybe heat) or possibly a die clash ? Victoria seems to have a raised jaw bone - the line of which runs up to her ear and then appears again behind her ear to the each of neck under her hair. Both the base of the R in Victoria and in Gratia (under the microscope) seemed to be joined at the foot which makes me think its damage Very Best Regards

Many thanks for confirming its 11.5 teeth PWA 1967 ! It could be a contender for Worst Penny Acquisition of the Week ! "Extremely misty" My error its more likely to be Obverse J as the B and back of Victoria's head are almost touching Reverse is just as bad - very foggy assuming 11.5 teeth with H over a gap exists as a reverse g that would seem to most the likely. Look forward to any thoughts ! Very Best Regards

1874H "H over Gap" 11 Teeth ? (terrible condition) Hope everyone had a good Christmas and Boxing Day Over here its been rather a misty and wet Boxing Day. So after taking the dogs out for a walk and eating left overs from yesterday, I decided to tidy up the various Penny trays weeding out duplicates and try to confirm obverses and reverses. Mostly going okay, reached 1874 and now as ever its the worn pennies that are causing the problems I found an 1874 narrow date where Britannia appears to have shorter hair and a very misty "Boxing Day" 1874H where the H appears to be over a Gap , 11 teeth or maybe 11 1/2 Wondered have there been lots of examples of this and what reverses might match ? (I think its obverse K)

Hope you all have a brilliant Christmas .... and once again many thanks to everyone for their help and support Best Regards

Many thanks for your help Martin, I just had a hunch there might be something interesting in the lot. This time I was right. On the outside of the flip is written Great Britain 1861 EF $50 (Initials M.A. on the back). But there was no mention of the B in Britt. Great to have it identified as a 6+G ! I'll put in the tray tomorrow Incidentally the other 1861 has something odd about the E in REG its probably damage but looks a bit like an L Great to get your thoughts on the 3rd halfpenny from the lot ! Best Regards

Once again many thanks for everyone's help I bought a collection of mixed bronze Farthings and Halfpennies, including one halfpenny for 1860, two for 1861 and several 1862's, these were the cast offs the auctioneer lumped together On looking at Secret Santa's Halfpenny Site I found an 1862 Halfpenny F over B in Britt. I started at 1861 and found what I think is the same thing On checking the 1860 I found it was a 1+A, but remembered I had two in better condition so on whim I had another look at them and on closer inspection. I wondered (just based on Britannia's hair) if one of them might be 1+A and the other a 1+A# Best Regards

Hi, I very recently bought a 1964 edition of English Copper, Tin and Bronze Coins by W. C. Peck (I have accumulated quite a few earlier halfpennies and farthings) I'm trying to make sure I describe them correctly This circulated example is from 1699 . I assumed it was Pack 687, but on looking closer the first A in BRITANNIA looks to be unbarred ? (the second A isn't so clear but might have part of a bar) I wondered if this was normal for the standard 1699 ? [The obverse looks a bit better than the reverse] Best Regards

Many thanks Bob, That was really helpful and of course sent me off looking at the rest of my 1860 beeded halfpennies I think every example that I have (I will double check) is 1 A and so far I have no examples the of 1* A While it might not be of interest, while looking for 1* A, I realised I had one possibly slightly unusual example of a 1 A (my second best) It has been double struck. There are traces of a 2nd linear circle, C T and possibly A in Victoria show doubling, the letters in BRITT show doubling, and the bottom of the R in REG is missing There may also be some slight doubling on the portrait of QV Very Best Regards and many thanks again for your help