|
The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com |
|
-
Content Count
12,710 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
331
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Rob
-
Crap grading, but based on his own website's criteria or so it seems. 1806 halfpenny. For some reason, grading as a result of wear resets to a new level at 1797AD. Watford Coins. I'm not surprised he wants Paypal only. If his address became known, we'd all come round and picket his house to stop any of his lots escaping into the big wide world.
-
1878 3rd head shilling with the last R in BRITANNIAR: struck over an underlying A. With the obverse barely making VF, it's not the best grade piece but the overstrike is clear.
-
I sold him a few pieces of crap once - after all he has to get it from somewhere . Not the fastest payer in the world if I remember correctly.
-
Collectors' Coins Great Britain 2006 Edition
Rob replied to Emperor Oli's topic in Rotographic Publications Forum
There's a open3/normal 3 comparison in Freeman. -
Another gem courtesy of eBay speak. The brockage line in the die is very clear. 1855 groat brockage.
-
A new range of confectionery from Rowntrees perhaps. I like the sky blue ones best, they taste delicious.
-
Colour is obtained naturally by exposure to the atmosphere. If you can't accept and appreciate some colour due to natural processes, then you are restricted to buying older coins that have been dipped (otherwise known as artificial de-toning) or alternatively pieces that have been hermetically sealed for a couple hundred years such as my 1731 shilling in the unconfirmed varieties section. Although not guaranteed, a touch of colour may enhance the beauty in my opinion but any person responsible for a Jackson Pollock style coin should be shot.
-
Exams and tests galore!
Rob replied to Emperor Oli's topic in Nothing whatsoever to do with coins area!
Sorry Sylvester, I digressed into an area I have difficulties with in the last paragraph which rather diverted the topic away from the original one of A level General Studies. No marks for me for failing the objective argument/discussion test. -
Exams and tests galore!
Rob replied to Emperor Oli's topic in Nothing whatsoever to do with coins area!
Therin lies the rub. General Studies is currently viewed as a Mickey Mouse subject because universities don't recognise it as a valid A level, but given that everyone doing A levels takes it anyway means that the opportunity could and should be taken to use this apparent waste of time for a better assessment of the individual. An ability to absorb a broad range of information unrelated to coursework is likely to be a very good indicator of a student's ability to think across subjects if the questions are phrased appropriately, as well as absorbing information. I can't think of any subjects which do not require a certain degree of lateral thinking encompassing other disciplines. At the very least it could be used to assess the candidate's literary and communicative abilities. It appears that only foreigners learn English these days, and then they will probably have difficulties understanding what a native of this country is trying to say. Key skills such as literacy are the things that appear to be singularly lacking in many people - cue as seen in eBay listings. The odd mistake is acceptable, but when a 12 year old child turns round to you as has happened and says "Caw, yaou dun ahf talk funny mite", a few seconds translation time is required. Init. -
Exams and tests galore!
Rob replied to Emperor Oli's topic in Nothing whatsoever to do with coins area!
General Studies really is a complete waste of time. Multiple choice for one paper and the rest is extended writing which isn't particularly challenging. I don't know why they don't do away with it. Critical thinking was a bit of a bore but I'm glad that I did it. We had to learn flaws in arguments, weight of evidence, things like that. In the exam those things were applied to various scenarios; for example, a plane crashed and there were two conflicting reports of what happened. You had to weigh up both sides and come to a judgement. Surely General Studies could be one of the most useful indicators of a person's ability to learn and think if judged in relation to the subjects studied to A level. Multiple choice for any subject is a waste of time, but the requirement to provide reasoned answers to topics outside of a student's core subjects shows a grasp of the outside world which many people seem to be sadly lacking. e.g. A 3 hour exam where you have to write 6 short pieces on say a science, a religon, a foreign country, literature, economics and recent history would quickly indicate those who have a wider appreciation of the world around them. This in itself is an essential attribute if you intend to be an integral part of the greater global society. Given the ease with which students are able to get straight A's by being taught to a syllabus which clearly lays out in advance the topics to be tested and schools which for the past 20-30 years have chosen the examination board to be used based on what is likely to give the best pass rates for their pupils, an examination on topics unknown in advance would be very informative. It would also give the opportunity to identify those who are able to communicate in their own language. Like it or not, we are not all equal and you do need to identify the better candidate for the job in question. -
This one is definately British
Rob replied to Flunter's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Spink is the annual tome produced by Spink giving a reasonably comprehensive list of British coin together with approximate prices. The new issue comes out at the end of September/beginning of October every year. The current edition looks like this. 3781 is the reference in this book. C W Peck wrote English Copper, Tin and Bronze Coins in the British Museum 1558-1958 and there are 2 editions. The first (of which there is an example for sale on eBay at this time) is not as good as the second which contains updated info. 1376 is the reference in this book for the halfpenny pictured. This is still the most comprehensive reference book for these coins. -
This one is definately British
Rob replied to Flunter's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
1806 Soho mint copper currency halfpenny with no berries in the olive branch. Spink 3781, Peck 1376. -
Although not strictly following the original line of this thread, here is an example of a dipped coin slabbed. It is difficult to see how a coin can be artificially detoned whilst in the slab, so one must assume that it was in this condition prior to slabbing. The links are the toning spots to the reverse together with the weakness on the obverse and reverse where the flan is thinner and so not completely struck up. The picture from Spink auction 4 lot 862, described as toned, extremely fine is the same coin as Goldberg 3359 21/9/05 (slabbed NGC MS63 1875720-009). The toning seen in the Goldberg picture is much deeper than when seen in the flesh. 1720 shilling. I can't add a scan of the piece in question as there is only 13k of space left for attachments but can supply to anyone interested. It also highlights the irrelevance of the grades assigned.
-
Funny how offenders are so apologetic once the story and subsequent cover-up has been exposed. More bizarrely, I'm not sure why so many people are willing to accept the apology in an attempt to rehabilitate as any offenders tend to be serial ones, and leopards don't change their spots. Past evidence of underhand activities suggests that the problem will resurface under another id.
-
Good to see that eyes have been opened in the US. IMO, dipped or AT'd coins have been slabbed for quite a long time. I suspect the overpowering attraction of filthy lucre has something to do with it.
-
Looks like you can add babyscarbabs to his list of shill bidder id's too. No longer resistered on eBay! babyscarbabs has gone too, although ebmplc is still going.
-
This guy always overgrades. Detail = extremely fine in most instances. This has the bonus of a silhouette. I also note that gg20285672 bid £97. At that level he would have to relist it as at least gVF
-
It is one of a number of types of model coinage produced in the Victorian era. Toy money you might say. Someone should have a piece which they can upload as an image. Made by Lauer of Nurnberg.
-
1922 Penny, Reverse of 27
Rob replied to Hussulo's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
The 1922 reverse has the shield closer to the border than the 1927 reverse. -
Looks like you can add babyscarbabs to his list of shill bidder id's too.
-
Looks like ebmplc likes numismast a lot. He's being a bit greedy though, he only paid just over £310 for this 1720 halfpenny and just over £220 for this 1694.
-
That's a very useful tool, I've heard of the search previously but have never been able to find it, could you point me in the right direction Follow the Advanced Search link and choose the By Bidder option, then tick the boxes you want for the time period in question and also tick whether high bidder or not.
-
Updated list of items remaining attached. Copy_of_Adams_Library_Duplicates.doc
-
Having acquired and assimilated Colin Adams' library following his half crown sale last December, I now have the attached list of books and other items for disposal. There are more to follow. I haven't had time to price them, but a general guide would be the low end of normal commercial prices. Sorry I can't give things away, but I have to defray the not inconsiderable purchase cost. Colin was also a collector of banknotes, so a small number of related items are also available. Anyone interested in specific items please PM me. Thanks. Adams_Library_Duplicates.doc
-
Usually I'd just do View > Toolbars and uncheck them if they're there, but if it's spyware then it's a totally different kettle of fish. Try googling the name of the search bar and if it's notorious (such as the mysearch bar) there are walkthroughs of how to get rid. Or switch to Firefox Thanks Oli. I'd already done a spyware check but had never been to View before so didn't know this unticking facility existed. I only use the bits I need. I must have accidentally hit it today, I certainly wouldn't choose to clutter the screen.