Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

VickySilver

Coin Hoarder
  • Posts

    3,767
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

Everything posted by VickySilver

  1. Ah, Robert, no travel for me other than Baltimore/NYC axis as I must watch after my son sans assistance these days and mercifully not too many Vick pieces to go. BTW, I think mine is the Colin Adams specimen and like the '56 date in general. There was a proof of one of the types batting about for a while a couple of years ago - did you bag that one?
  2. Cr-- and more cr--, great. Well this bit is not quite as crappy....LOL. I'm quite glad others are attracted to these narrows and wides, I liked the well-shaped myself.
  3. Glad to send all the narrow dates I find - LOL - but please do send me the choice original red 1882 Londons,'64s, '69s, '71s that you find. I figure one for one on the '82, right?
  4. Oh, love those 1839-1970 pennies! NOT the "Hypervarietals" narrow date cr--. However, love the minor silver of Victoria also.
  5. Well, minor clips don't get a lot of "play", but OMS (off metal strikes) and wrong planchets seem to do a bit better.... As above, need to see the coin if possible.
  6. I'm no expert in Indian, but the lettering looks very suspect from the letters themselves to their orientation and spacing...
  7. I have a couple that are either chrome or vanadium plated (I think) - I suppose post minting....
  8. Scarce coin, rare if you can find a fully struck obverse (think they may not exist) but more common that catalogue in VF-GVF. The half sov of London this 1879 date is actually equally scarce or perhaps a bit moreso with truly mint examples also quite rare. I'm thinking I may have seen more than five in the previous year...
  9. Good for the soul to sell a bit now and then, particular if you have a second passable example to keep. I have been forced to trade/sale some bits to get others and will sell seconds (even though I did let go an '03 Halfcrown that was the equal of the one I kept and am still a bit sad about). A couple of years ago I gave up nearly all aspirations of Vicky gold and dumped the lot for a nice profit... Go for it!
  10. Sell! I am with you on replacement being 600-800 pounds raw for a similar piece. Great for Newman, no doubt a wonderful man but I don't think that is worth a premium (or much of one) to me at least. I love and avidly collect 6d's as you know and would not touch it at such a price. Got mine from Baldwin some years ago for 400 quid.
  11. That yours for sale on the bay of E? Good score there... I collect Franklin Mint to some degree but only would be marginally interested in these. Are there any mules with mixed obverse and reverses? Those would be of interest. PM me if you'd like...
  12. What did the gold 1924 sixpence go for?
  13. Besides the obvious blurry photo? 1879 Victoria Sovereign Ref DC10
  14. To diverge slightly, I wonder which you might prefer if given the choice? Proof or currency 1860 copper farthing?
  15. Well thanks for that, must be a bit of brain fade.....I think that is only an average struck obverse, decent reverse with better than average lustre. I still place that at 2k and think you should shop a bit & be patient. These auctions, and particularly the onlines (such as DNW) have been verging on lunatic prices. Just try and guess how much that would have gone for at Heritage with a slabbed Red and Brown 64 with lots of flowery descriptions!!!
  16. Must be me, but I can't find its sale. 2800 over the top IMO and 2k should have been fair. My recall was that it was NOT an exceptional coin. I am a bit suspicious of photos from LCA and if spending that much money am of a mind to have seen the specimen in hand or at least had a representative to do so. This is a scarcer date not doubt, but somehow see it up for sale more frequently at auction in "top grades" more often than we should.
  17. Goodness, they are what they are. We are not going to necessarily know intent, especially of the Royal Mint!
  18. OK, Rob probably knows the specifics but at some point there was a citation to the effect that a short run of pennies was required and some (59-60,000???) were struck with only a few - however many that was - getting out.
  19. I always think of the bottom loop of the "3" as being hammered or beaten down flat ( ie open).
  20. And the 1860/59 did circulate as evidenced by the condition of many extant specimens, many poorly struck and circulated even after the change to smaller modulus and less intrinsically valuable bronze bun head pennies.
  21. Me too Maybe another set or two also
  22. And I have an older SNC circular with one for sale....
×
×
  • Create New...