VickySilver

OK, I am going to lose the laziness and check my '68s this weekend also. I think this date in unc. is not so very common. Homework assignment will be to try to figure out how to get pictures up...

Yes, those last two are showstoppers in unc. I won't say I traded the farm, but kind of... Dritanniar of 1878 in unc. almost impossible, and some other dates as well. Have to settle on less than fantastic unc.s sometimes (well, for a while as it just gnaws at you).

Uhhh, yea that would be the excuse for no London 1882 in the collection. I think I have one, but have got to figure out how to picture it and see if you guys can massacre it for problems....Pretty much GVF but does not match the die combo with NO microscopic evidence of H or erasure. I gotta find it and put it up here to get crushed. PS Bought it from a very good source as well...

Yes, I did do that and maybe should have held it (the '03 2/6) but it was beautiful. Maybe Spink vintage early '90s? Can't remember, but the one I have is quite pleasant.

And maybe that will stimulate me to take it to another level. I want one of the new ones. Who will the authors be? I thought maybe Baldwin's might turn an effort in. Congratulations on following through with these dies...

Wow, you make me feel bad. I love Vicky silver (obviously) and rather fancy I have a decent 6d collection but just haven't gotten into the Davies varietals and kind of follow ESC however crude it might be. Congratulations on being "truer" numismatists! Does a gem unc. 1893 Jub give me brownie points?

You know the height of this type of absurdity is the assembler of certain large sovereign collection who did just that: collected by die number AND die state! Yikes!!

OK, confess your guilt to hoarding! Well, I do on occasion but note that in recent years as I want pieces that I have no business owning, I put them up for trade and make the impossible somehow and magically happen. I do regret some of those "B" coins, and remember one Unc. 1903 half crown that I hate thinking about....Yikes!

Yes, too snotty. Sorry, off my Wheaties on the home front.

Ummm, because I have some?

Yes, that is true mostly. The problem as I found out when I sold some proofs at Spink not so very long ago is that the prices were a bit UNDERWHELMING and less than I would have been able to sell for otherwise, and had to subtract out shipping, insurance, and commissions not to mention all the other sundry charges. The two matrices you showed would likely not attract a lot of interest, the crown moreso though sadly lacking a date and being only the rev. trial. Another thing the RM did was to mark/inscribe or number specimens and then either leave them that way, or heaven forbid, SCRATCH out the details. In fact, I have a pattern 1951 where they did just that - yikes! Your firstmost piece appears to show some rough handling as well and was lucky to slab as a "62". In general, the more valuable bits are either those with complete obverse and reverses with date or second choice either the obv. or reverse complete with the designation "MODEL" on the opposite side.

This also looks to be matrix material. Hopefully not too much corrosion or damage... This would be George VI not E8. Also, Steve Hill at Baldwin would be the man on this material IMO. He will also confirm there are many such pieces NOT in Merry Olde' LOL, I might know something of quite a few...

This looks to be a type of matrix....

Yes, I am also quite familiar with many of these trial strikes and patterns. I must admit, this particular specimen is not generally known but follows the trend of what the Royal Mint was doing in the 1920s with George V and 1937 with earlier George VI - 1937 issues- in which there were entire denomination runs with trial obverses and reverses. Also true for Edward VIII. Krause Standard Catalog of World Coins has a section on patterns and trials, but mainly reporting on the earlier bits I have mentioned. Dies from this era I am unfamiliar with. Are you sure they are not matrices as these were also made. I might be interested in this material as well as I am rather advanced in this area, so you may PM me if you don't want it all out on a public forum.

Haha. OK, I'm not guilty of that one! I retired the aggressive techniques except for the "two plier twist mode", rumoured to have been used on a FIVE FIGURE coin by somebody... If I needed the date, I just don't think I could come up with a bid for that one. Good Luck to the seller!

You guys have already seen the London Coins Auction Lot 1985 (I think!) which is an "EF" 1905 2/6. Wow, just too much edge business going on and some less than strategic hits on obverse, etc.

Yes, I still like CC, though the firm has changed a bit & have gotten some very nice bits through NP. Ras, as you like to call him, has the most interesting lists that are like treasure hunts - a lot of stuff very high but some great bits hidden in there. Have even bought some fairly cheap stuff that was really good and a couple of farm-ransoming bits as well. Funny, don't seem to recall ever dealing with Mitchell but will keep my eyes and ears open. Back to the original coin, I like to see how these perform in auction but best to be there live or over the 'net to follow interests and the pacing of it. So just how an '05 do in a competitive auction? Unc, EF coins...

I think he's run into the problem that small/medium size dealers now have: no stock. Not an excuse, but rather a guess.

Colin, you got us all behaving like sharks with blood in the water. OK, I am guilty too. Will you be selling through one of the major auction houses. Guess I might bump heads a bit with Accumulator as I do love pennies and not just the silver - but get just a tad loonier over silver Vicky bits.... A coin I recently got perhaps as rare as unc '05 2/6 is the MS66 1889 sm Hd shilling. NIIIIIICCCCCCEEEEEE!

My likely unpopular view is the coin in question is more likely an EF obverse, GEF reverse with some signs, IMO, Also think its been cleaned a bit... Still nice. My value, if anyone cares is probably closer to 4k mark.

The off year proofs and patterns would I think tend to be a stopper, let alone the E8 issues and coins such as the 1954 penny...

I also seem to recall Spink having a Mint State specimen in about 1980 that was pictured in at least one of their SNCs (the good ole days)..

Have that catalogue somewhere, able to post a picture? I seem to recall a posting on these boards about these before. I am not convinced there definately was only one die combination as the extant population is either too worn, and/or decent specimens far too few to make such a pronouncement IMO.

And complete collection! Wonderful! Well, most of the rest of us can only hope one day. I fear that the endpoint changes along our collecting paths, never quite gettiing there....

Ouch! Why do almost all the '82 London pennies look as though they've been lying at the bottom of some creek for 100+ years?