Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Gary D

Accomplished Collector
  • Content Count

    1,655
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Gary D

  1. Gary D

    Ebay's Worst Offerings

    "Care in the community" has a lot to answer for. Im new here so thanks for introducing me to this bloke got to love this one, ebay No 370831082109. Mint lustre specially created with a piece of Scotchbrite!!! whilst being held with a pair of pliers! But folk are buying this rubbish for silly prices! see this 1870BB 5Fr piece £205 is a reasonable price for EF+ but this coin struggles to make Fine (€22 in TB25) the ribbon is just visible on the neck The minimum criteria to make VF (TTB45) a €30 coin, requires the point of the moustache to be clearly visible But then I'm just using the grading standards from Le Franc Was this a BIN as I can't see any bids on it. I wonder if the 8 page views is accurate. BIN with positive feedback I wonder if 'very considerate seller' means the coin was returned? Certainly should have been, but there again shouldn't have been bought in the first place. If you look at the feedback that he left for the buyer ("...Grateful for acceptance delay caused by wrong coin"), it shows that he initially sent the buyer the wrong coin. So, not only does he know nothing about coins, he's incompetent too. Let me think about this, the buyer wins the coin midday on the 26th, gets the wrong coin, returns it, receives the correct coin and leaves feed back all within 4 days.
  2. Gary D

    DNW TODAY

    Yes, I had the same experience. I am assuming/hoping they will get all that fixed in the days to come. I think this is a result of the new website, I have phoned, very quick and helpful as usual...all sorted!! I had an invoice arrive in the post from the last sale and had to phone in to pay. I couldn't see any way of paying from the web site.
  3. Gary D

    Ebay's Worst Offerings

    "Care in the community" has a lot to answer for. Im new here so thanks for introducing me to this bloke got to love this one, ebay No 370831082109. Mint lustre specially created with a piece of Scotchbrite!!! whilst being held with a pair of pliers! But folk are buying this rubbish for silly prices! see this 1870BB 5Fr piece £205 is a reasonable price for EF+ but this coin struggles to make Fine (€22 in TB25) the ribbon is just visible on the neck The minimum criteria to make VF (TTB45) a €30 coin, requires the point of the moustache to be clearly visible But then I'm just using the grading standards from Le Franc Was this a BIN as I can't see any bids on it. I wonder if the 8 page views is accurate.
  4. Gary D

    Overdipped?

    Ah I see, so by soldered fixing they mean welded. Closer to the process of welding than lead soldering, closer still to brazing! The silver solder is designed to melt only fractionally ahead of the silver item itself. I'm no expert on silver soldering, but I have soldered a couple of split-ring findings in the past. Overcook the heat by the tiniest amount, and the whole thing becomes a molten blob! The reaction with solder and the parent metal is called wetting.
  5. Gary D

    Ebay's Worst Offerings

    lol must have been in cahoots with someone I reckon, doubt that this was a genuine sale! What are you doing watching such c**p anyways?! I believe it was a Gouby X whoever bought it well spotted! Nice bargain too!! I had a close look at that one and decided that it wasn't a Gouby X Definitely Gouby X, I was the underbidder I'd like to see a better picture to be totally convinced. The I of IND worries me, it needs to be to tooth and to me it was too inconclusive to make a bid. Anyway I've got a slightly better one so wouldn't have gone to £15 just to flip it.
  6. Gary D

    Overdipped?

    Easily removed if you have a soldering iron. Probably ex mount. A soldering iron is more likey to make an even bigger mess. If it solder it will have alloyed with the silver. Really? I can't imagine any soldering iron getting anywhere near hot enough to melt the silver so that it would alloy. That's how solder works, it forms an alloy with the surface of the material being joined. It's not like glue which adheres to any roughness in the surface texture.It actually penetrates to a depth.
  7. Its very scary....i suspect the Chinese have already sorted out the problems...the 1905 fake shillings are much easier to spot......personally I would avoid the 05 halfcrowns in high grade...even well known dealers have been fooled, believe me......stick to the 03 for the time being .. Apologies to all you techies out there....i am an old dog....still, I havent done too badly.....woof Please enlighten me. Altered dates are usually easy to spot but I wasn't aware that there were also copies. There was that 1905 shilling copy thread on here, where I posted up some big images of John's coin to view! Worth a look if you haven't seen it! I don't recall it, a search didn't find anything.
  8. Its very scary....i suspect the Chinese have already sorted out the problems...the 1905 fake shillings are much easier to spot......personally I would avoid the 05 halfcrowns in high grade...even well known dealers have been fooled, believe me......stick to the 03 for the time being .. Apologies to all you techies out there....i am an old dog....still, I havent done too badly.....woof Please enlighten me. Altered dates are usually easy to spot but I wasn't aware that there were also copies.
  9. Gary D

    more FAKES

    No apology required - your image fills my browser page, no problem. Colin probably couldn't post his as it was way oversize. Now that I'm aware of it that wonky I sticks out like a sore thumb.
  10. Gary D

    more FAKES

    1. As you type into the text box, you will notice under it a blue Attachments banner. Click 'Choose File' and navigate to where the picture is on your computer 2. Having selected it, click the dark blue 'Attach This File' button, and wait for it to be uploaded 3. Then click the 'Add to Post' button which appears when it's been uploaded. That puts the code into the text box for the attachment 4. Then just 'Add Reply' as per usual. Of course, your picture must not be greater than 150k but I've explained how to achieve that many many times and there's now a Sticky to that effect in the Beginners forum! ------ Incidentally, your analysis of dodgy 1905 halfcrowns won't apply to anything VF or less where the I of QVI has worn away. Taken the word out of my mouth, the handful on ebay at the moment are all worn to the extent that the I has gone.
  11. Gary D

    Forum was down 3/6/13

    1972 Triumph 2000, you don't want to get that wet, it'd rust away in front of your very eyes. I had a Porsche once but had to sell it for a family car once the little n was too big to sit in the back.
  12. Gary D

    more FAKES

    Pray tell, I have a fake 1905 half crown and wish I knew what points it out as a fake. From what I gleaned on this very forum, there's a small break in the R of EDWARDVS that is the prime giveaway on many of them. But there may be other flaws on those from other sources? Are you certain that this only appears on fakes? I have seen more 1905 halfcrowns with the defect on the R of EDWARDVS, than without. The EF example in the Andrew Scothern collection (being auctioned by DNW later this month) also has the defect. The only giveaway of fakes that I'm aware of is the wonky I of QVI on the reverse. As I say, I only heard about this on this forum, and only in connection with fakes. There may well be genuine examples with the same defect, but I hadn't heard of them here! I pointed out on here some time ago the broken R but it was pooh poohed at the time. My fake is 0.900 silver so not quite sterling. It's got the wonky I.
  13. Gary D

    Coin dreams

    The ones that bob?
  14. Gary D

    Ebay's Worst Offerings

    Pretty cool, though I'm not sure how comfortable that sofa would be! I just hope they went through all the coins first to pick out any rarities before they trashed them.
  15. Gary D

    Ebay's Worst Offerings

    With a bullshit story to go with it. Not bad for an altered date, probably worth a good £100
  16. But you can roll it in glitter
  17. Gary D

    ODD FIVE PENCE PIECE

    Don't shout, it's rude.
  18. Gary D

    Ebay's Worst Offerings

    High grade, scarce and rare. link
  19. Has the case got the Royal Mint logo on the inside of the lid and ER crowned 2nd June 1953 on the top of the lid. If so someone has put the coins from a plastic set into the case. Or is there no royal mint logo and plain front or something about the coronation on the outside, may just have a small gold cross in the bottom left corner. If so these are put together by someone else and normally sold as specimen sets. Did the seller describe them as a proof set otherwise you may be on a sticky wicket.
  20. Gary D

    Ebay's Worst Offerings

    Possibly interesting. Looks like a gold £5 but I think this design finished in 2008,at 30g not heavy enough to be gold.My link
  21. Gary D

    Ebay's Worst Offerings

    Anyone want to buy some high grade slabs, they may even have some coins in them. Slabs for sale
  22. This arrived today from an ebay sale. The seller had listed it as a new variety and although skeptical, I could lay my hand on my milled edge fake at the time, took a chance. So the Crown has arrived and the seller is correct it is a very sharp strike and the observe rim is very narrow compared to all the other rocking horse crowns I've seen. Mind you I haven't been looking out for this one so they may pop up all over the place now that I've seen this one. Weight is 38.24g which I assume is within limits. The bust is about 0.4mm bigger as is the distance between the tips of the teeth across the coin. The reverse looks the same as the normal issue apart from the very sharp strike.
  23. I would suggest that it's a blocked die and is progressive. I would also suggest that as it's a blocked die that it was used at the end of the 1915 run over into the beginning of the 1916 run. My reasoning for this is that the 1916 show a full half tooth missing whereas the 1915 has just a crescent missing from the right side of the tip.
  24. Gary D

    Taking Photos of Coins

    Has anybody tried using a LED ring light around the lens. Are they any good for close-up work or too bright for shiny coins.
×