Peckris

Just a "This Album is Empty" dead link

You're welcome Alan. This is the original..

N-I-I-I-I-CE! That puts my 1903 halfcrown in the shade!

What does NGC's 58 equate to?

That looks (probably - it's very worn) a third bust London Mint issue. That would need to be at least Fine or near it to have any value. However, there are a couple of interesting features on yours : the first L of GVLIELMVS has a dot within it and may have been struck over another letter. Also, where there should simply be a dot after GVLIELMVS there seems to be some kind of misstrike connecting the S to the dot. Whether this is enough to constitute excitement among varieties collectors is moot - there are many many errors in this series and they have to be a very clear and discernible punching error to warrant attention.

I got it for $39. To be honest, the obverse is AVF but I'd rate the reverse as VF+ ... but still a bargain Actually, I tell a lie - according to my database I paid £21.27 for it

You successfully posted the picture of the reverse. The forum only allows 150k per post, so if you add a separate reply to this topic, it gives you another 150k to play with to post the obverse.

That makes complete sense. With dies already in preparation for 1894 issues, why would they go to the expense and trouble of recutting an 1892 punch just to press a few pennies?

I wonder what the 1999 Krause lists a 1903 halfcrown at? I got one in VF from a New York dealer for £26

Hi Alan, Welcome to the forums Your shilling is a 1696 issue, but which one depends on the bust, and what - if any - is the letter below the bust. For that reason we would need to see the obverse ("heads") side. Do you have a picture? There are one or two rare varieties but we would need to see the other side. As for condition, it's not quite Fair which is the very minimum condition to be collected, and then only for scarce or rare dates and varieties. Usually, a coin needs to be the next grade up from Fair - Fine - to have any value listed. Your coin - assuming it's not a rare variety - is really not much more than bullion value, but worth keeping for its historic value.

We should all complain directly to the RM about their crass insensitivity.

That's a good reproduction Kris - is that on the Epson V500, or V600? That's scanned on the Epson Perfection 4870 Photo that must be getting on for 6 or 7 years old. Probably the equivalent of the V500 or V600 today. The latest ones use LED lamps and mine's plasma so there's no longer a direct equivalent. Ah right - thanks. I'll get further advice from the photographic forum I'm a member of, but you've both been helpful. Thanks again. (By the way, I actually like film grain. It's much better than the 'noise' you get on digital sensors. Others must agree as Photoshop has an 'add film grain' filter!)

You did ok - a Fine 1860 penny for less than £3 including postage is fair enough I'd say. You certainly weren't burned, pissed or not!!

That's a good reproduction Kris - is that on the Epson V500, or V600?

There's a big difference between celebrating and commemorating. Commemoration means to remember and show respect for, which seems ok to me. I think he's referring to the use of that Kitchener recruiting poster? Absolutely appalling and shoddy poor taste and lack of respect.

Ok. If you do find out, let me know? And also, what the resolution is. I find a great limitation with the 2400 dpi of the external shop - they look fine, but just try and bring any shadow detail out and all you get is gaudy luminescent streaks of nothing Having said that, I've seen an Epson photo scanner online for just under £200 that's 6400 dpi resolution which is getting on for three times as much res.

Never wash your hands if you can't tell the difference between a buffalo and a bison.

Oh, which one? There's a range that begins with V followed by a number - is it one of those? And what don't you like about it?

Their one nice gesture is that there is going to be a 50p with the heraldic reverse that Ironside first submitted before the Britannia was eventually accepted.

That would be telling I like your posts too, while we're in this brief cocoon of mutual admiration

What are you using? I've had some of mine done by an external shop, but they come back at 2400 dpi resolution - they're ok, but you couldn't say any better than that. I'd like to do my own, and get perfect high-res copies.

Ah, the great days of Communist cameras! I began with a Russian made Zorki 4 (virtual exact reproduction of a prewar Leica IIIb) for which I got 3 lenses - I still have the camera and standard lens and I bet it works if I got a film for it. I also briefly used a Lubitel (TLR) but it was a hassle getting 120 roll film processed; I did my own D&P of black and white 35mm film back then. And a Leningrad light meter (the Zorki and Lubitel had nothing electronic anywhere in them, not even a light meter) which was pretty good. Now I slum it with a Lumix superzoom FZ camera. Ok, it has a tiny tiny sensor (makes 110 film look like medium format ) but as long as I am aware of its limitations it takes some good pictures... P1000086.jpg I'm far from expert but that's a really well composed photo! Why, thank you! It was quite well received in the photography forum I'm a member of

Which of course became the standard Roman silver coin in the later days of the Empire. Those official antoniniani looked about as authentic as Seuk's collection of Geo III shillings.

Recruiting sergeant: "...the latest nuclear submarines." Homer Simpson: "Nucular. Nucular. It's nucular." Recruiting sergeant: [sigh]. "Whatever."

Ah, the great days of Communist cameras! I began with a Russian made Zorki 4 (virtual exact reproduction of a prewar Leica IIIb) for which I got 3 lenses - I still have the camera and standard lens and I bet it works if I got a film for it. I also briefly used a Lubitel (TLR) but it was a hassle getting 120 roll film processed; I did my own D&P of black and white 35mm film back then. And a Leningrad light meter (the Zorki and Lubitel had nothing electronic anywhere in them, not even a light meter) which was pretty good. Now I slum it with a Lumix superzoom FZ camera. Ok, it has a tiny tiny sensor (makes 110 film look like medium format ) but as long as I am aware of its limitations it takes some good pictures...