Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

davidrj

Accomplished Collector
  • Posts

    1,740
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by davidrj

  1. Do they charge the same for coins they don't slab?
  2. Far too much titilation here methinks
  3. I wonder whether anybody knew how rare a 1933 penny was in 1934?? I suspect there were very few collectors of the current base metal coins prior to Peck, and absolutely no incentive to fabricate a 1933 back in 1934 Does anyone know when the first altererd dates surfaced? and now we are getting replicas of the Lavrillier patterns listed as genuine - link
  4. Interesting! seems a sensible option I do wonder how long we will be using any notes and coins Does the future of numismatics lie in collecting credit and debit cards.? I would think early ones are pretty scarce as we all are encouraged to destroy them once they have expired
  5. Just remember - you will never win!
  6. Jamaica pennies struck by RM dated 1899 & 1900, none dated 1901 like this
  7. Museums use Renaissance Wax on ancients Dunno whether anyone has done controlled trials on modern BU bronze Some discussion here
  8. Call me old fashioned but that stikes me as plated. I saw that one and convinced myself it was plated, but then CuNi can go that horrid yellow colour
  9. I think the central hole would part of the original blank preparation, rather than a two stage process. Bit I'm happy to be corrected if anyone knows the actual mechanics of holey coin production
  10. Wouldn't BWA blanks have the central hole prior to strtiking? Trying to think what blank it could be, Kings Norton didn't do Jamaica pennies (only outsourced to Heatons and Ottawa) George V pennies get more and more interesting
  11. you would need a serial number (like a banknote) for that, a date is meaningless
  12. I suspect the real answer is "tradition"
  13. Yes, really helpful that one!
  14. the font is different - look at the final 8s in my composite above - the variant 8 is neater and symmetrical So, although it may be very hard to spot, and invokes little interest, it is as significant as the open 3 for 1903 whether the change for either year was deliberate, or a busy mint worker accidentally used a numeral punch designed for a different coin, we will never know. the variations of 3 in 1863 pennies may actually be due to where the coin was struck (by the Royal Mint, Watt or Heaton???) interesting question, why are coins dated anyway? or more to the point why are the dies dated, as there is no guarantee as to when a coin was actually struck?
  15. it took a lot of searching for me to find the two wide date varieties, and was totally confused by finding the wide date normal 8 first (not in Gouby) this is a case where a scanner comes in handy, you can image say a dozen coins in one go and blow up areas of interest on screen Impossible (for me) to spot the difference naked eye
  16. Very difficult to spot, took a while to convince myself there was any difference, nothing like an open 3 (1863 or 1903) - so I would think demand to be so minimal as not to attract any premium. some pictures to follow from top - 1898 Aa "normal" 8 over gap, 1898 Ab "normal" 8 over bead, 1898 Bb "variant" 8 over bead
  17. Very difficult to spot, took a while to convince myself there was any difference, nothing like an open 3 (1863 or 1903) - so I would think demand to be so minimal as not to attract any premium. some pictures to follow
  18. Do you still have the link? Did you mean this one?, he's been trying to flog it for some time, NOT an open 3
  19. "HAND POLISHED, BY SPECIAL COIN HANDLERS" link
  20. and another note the triangle shape on the neck, but I of BRITT to a bead is the clincher
  21. Here's a "hollow neck" 1911 Gouby X
×
×
  • Create New...
Test