Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Nick

Accomplished Collector
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    2,053

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Everything posted by Nick

  1. Nick
    I do like the coloured tone of the 1911 proofs. I'll bet they are even more colourful than the picture suggests.
  2. Nick

    Guess the grade

    Nick replied to azda's topic in TPG Discussions

    I would say that the 1967 is slightly higher grade than the 1965, although not quite as good a strike. Can't see any reason why either would be less than MS 64.
  3. Nick
  4. Nick

    1920 Florin wanted.

    Nick replied to The Coinery's topic in Wanted

    Here's the other variety Davies 1744 (I think).
  5. Nick

    1920 Florin wanted.

    Nick replied to The Coinery's topic in Wanted

    I have a Davies 1746 (sorry not for sale), but didn't realise they are that difficult to acquire. LCA have sold a few over the years.
  6. Nick

    Huge list of CGS coins for trade/sale

    Nick replied to Nordle11's topic in Items For Sale

    Very nice. They don't often appear in decent grade and even when they do, they rarely have the eye appeal that yours does.
  7. Nick

    Huge list of CGS coins for trade/sale

    Nick replied to Nordle11's topic in Items For Sale

    I don't have access to the CGS images. Can you put the image on your website? Or post it here?
  8. Nick

    Huge list of CGS coins for trade/sale

    Nick replied to Nordle11's topic in Items For Sale

    Wow. That 1828 halfcrown is by far the best example I've seen of that rare date.
  9. Nick
  10. Nick

    Huge list of CGS coins for trade/sale

    Nick replied to Nordle11's topic in Items For Sale

    Looks like LCGS have noticed lots of non-paying access to their images.
  11. Nick
    I'll say PF 66 too.
  12. Nick
  13. Nick
  14. Nick
    Seems perhaps a little harshly graded. I've seen many worse 62's than that.
  15. Nick
    I agree.
  16. Nick
    Found another 1868 Maundy set which seems to be a different obverse 3 die. The I in BRIT is less upright than the earlier ones I posted.
  17. Nick
    Those both look to be obverse 2. Obverse 3 has two tufts of hair that "point" towards the R: at the end of BRITANNIAR. I can't see any obvious differences in those two examples, and they are lit differently which doesn't help, although the I in REGINA looks slightly doubled in the first.
  18. Nick
    Picture of the 3 with reasonably decent images:.
  19. Nick
    I only found four images that are definitely Maundy (ie still part of their set) and only three of the photos were good enough quality to believe the 3d's are from the same dies. A much larger sample would be needed to draw any conclusions.
  20. Nick
    From the small sample of 1868 Maundy sets I could find online, they all have a Davies type 3 obverse. The RRITANNIAR is obverse type 2, so more than likely a currency die.
  21. Nick
  22. Nick
    I don't know what chemicals are contained in the lining of those 1911 proof set boxes, but they certainly do produce some wacky colourful toning.
  23. Nick
    Could it be a maundy die that was later used for currency? The annual reports show that there were 43 obverse dies used for 1,469,592 currency 3d pieces and 3 obverse dies for 7,704 maundy 3d pieces. If just one of those dies contained the error, it's unlikely that there were originally more than 10 or 20 thousand RRITANNIAR minted. It does seem unusual that the error was not corrected, given the number of B over R in BRITTANIAR that exist in other denominations.
  24. Nick
  25. Nick
×