Coinery

Whenever I've sold off silver B on eBay, I've always bumped into the least decent % of eBayers. I'd say I've had to relist around a third of the bullion I've sold! I did get a nice surprise with the last listings, however, when someone from Estonia won all 4 100g lots at a good price, and duly thanked me with good FB a week later!

Blinking heck, that is good! I can understand, if you are a serious collector of early milled, why you'd want an example of these faked coins. Let's face it, if you're well enough placed to be buying originals of these types of coins, it's not going to break your bank to run a secondary collection of counterfeits and fakes alongside.

Totally agree, if that coin has full mint lustre I'd be extremely surprised. It could be the photography, but it's not something that generally lets Lucido down!

Agreed!

The ones we made had lungs in them in the late 80's/early 90's!

Slightly less attractive print on the reverse of this one...just in case Azda thinks I'm going soft on prints!

Haggis - An acquired taste when boiled (unless you love boiled lamb fat), amazing when sliced and fried like black pudding! Totally different animal, then!

I think the big problem is, unless any said variety is acknowledged to be so by the academic towers, it just doesn't exist, other than speculativley (unless you can privately prove otherwise). In general, there are few who splash out on a variety/rarity unless it's been sanctioned by 'the board', though we all enjoy pushing the boundaries! If you want a new varity out of this, Phil, you just need to find a high-grade example from the same die, and/or look for any features that can link it to the original 3 die. All good fun!

Amazing how that 'back loop' and the protrusions I saw on the phone have disappeared! It could be a three, though I'd not personally buy it as such, or truly think it to be, not without a die-match or much better evidence!Edit: Idon't think it's an overdate, sorry!

Welcome aboard, Phil! A really difficult one...it does look as though there are some interesting features. However, I would say that, what looks like an upper back-curve of a three, is just a little too inconsistent with the shape for a full-shaped 3? Also, the little prominences at the front top-edge, and front-edge, of the 5, look a little damaged/clogged die, cruddy, a little like the edges of the 4? I don't know, would need a little more experience of type, which is not in short supply on here! A die-study would help!

Not for class pieces, I'd say not! But [by human nature] what bid is determined by the estimate! As an example, you bid five times the estimate to secure the coin, if the estimate had been five times what it was, you would still have had a go, and could possible have had some competition alongside you?Edit: strike 'by human nature'

And thats how non rarities sell for above their price because everyone who has an eye on a particular coin will have observied the esrimate and thought well maybe someone will go higher than top estimate, so i'll go a smidge higher, meanwhile the other 5 or 6 wannabes will be thinking the same thing and do the same and in the end we have an overpriced coin. Another thing most auction houses do, is place the estimate range lower than the value to stimulate bidding, and also only let the seller place a reserve at 60% of the low estimate (I know Baldwins does it this way)! When you're buying to sell, the low estimates always stand out but, as you say, I think they are generally set to attract bidders! The truly class material, however, generally adopts a different principle entirely, and I'm guessing that you all know what I mean by that! Top dollar estimate to attract an 80% paper bid, and they'll go from there, thank-you very much!

Hey, £5 was OK?

Sorry Paulus, but

These guys are good aren't they? Even though I've been here a few years, I still marvel at the knowledge and helpfulness of the people on this forum, I hope you'll stay onboard, you've got some decent queries going on!

Sorry for any confusion, it was Flash's post I was curious about and asked images for! Sorry if that stressed out your camera, Goom!

Please do go into it, and provide photos if possible! We're always up for updating our knowledge in these areas.

And supply and demand!

Whoooo hoo, get you...will look into that!

It's true the £107 bid was made 4 minutes after bidding opened, but you need other bidders to push the current winning bid up and it took nearly 2 days to pass the £100 mark. Of course, but this is my def of protection/shilling! List a coin, protect it immediately with a bid you won't accept less than (the newly listed brigade are surely smart enough not to place their top bid within 4 mins of listing, with 7/10 days to run, hoping they'll get a bargain?), and then go to bed for the week, forgetting all about it!That's how I see it! ???

NOT an open 3 - and it would be the finest known if it was!! So relax.. Finest known jumped to my excited heart for a couple of mins too! I thought for a last min snipe, whilst painting the boat, brush in one hand, phone in the other, it was worth a pop!

I'll have to relook, as I honestly thought the £100+ bid time was minutes after the listing time?

Is mine the middle one?Edit: aye, I should've let Trac buy it!

Fashion. Ayephones being a 'must have' accessory, all the embedded faults are therefore 'must have faults'. Get yourself a cheap mobile for a tenner and enjoy a hassle free life. Few people need to do much more than phone or text as the screens are too small to be very practical for surfing the web.I'm back, having flattened the battery! You are of course right Rob I'm caught though! Paulus, sadly no option to disconnect the battery with the o-so-amazing iPhone, you've got to suffer until the bitter flat-battery end!

Not sure where I am on this forum, as I can't see...however, this is the second time mt phone had jammed on the forum, requiring the battery to flatten before I can move on! I can't even switch the phone off, but couldne an ageing phone, though has all updates! Can't even phone. Friend! Phone or software?