Coinery

I've HAD one of these, and seen around 4, one at the last W&W sale in a lot I bought (was kindly credited)! The gouge through the crown is standard on this copy, unless of course this is the original? 230851403945

Zero feedback, but that photography and background looks mighty familiar!

Buckcoins (which i've already proved on the forum has upped grades on purchases). I'm looking forward to meeting the young Buck at a coin auction, if only to give him the look of displeasure I feel for him. I bought a £200+ coin from him recently that failed to materialise! I politely wrote him emails...not a single civilised response. I've been sorely tempted to transcribe our entire communications, just so people can see for themselves what an unreasonable man he is! I've failed to win (so effectively bid up) probably a hundred or more of his coins, and that's worth a huge sum to him alone, not to mention the £1000's I'd already spent with him! What a complete...

I thought that when I was visiting their site at the time of my C2 5/3 farthing query. I couldn't believe some of the W3&M stuff either, but especially the C2 material. CC not spot on, Spink's listing fakes, what's it all coming to? Bring back the Shanghai boys, all is forgiven!

Nothing to suggest it is anything other than an I Agreed. The serifs on the cross bar of the T are angled, while the "serifs" here are right angles. You can also clearly see the top edge of the 'I' well below the 'top (bottom) edge' of where the proposed 'L' would HAVE to be!

'Fraid so! Clearly so!

Any ideas why a '2' would be in the obverse legend (E of Elizabeth over 2) of a sixpence? Has this been seen before in other series, it's not recorded in BCW? The 2 measures 1.79mm, identical to the reverse 'inverted' 2!

Thanks for the trust AND privilege, Del!

So...I think the conclusions will now be, well, conclusive! Here are two close-up photos, taken with the light angled differently to best show the 'ups and downs' of the contours in the region of the 'I'! The diagonal line to the left appeared convex in some shots, but is actually a concave 'gouge,' which I think could've easily been mistaken for the left leg of a 'V'? Judgements, please, would be very much appreciated!

so it was you that broke it then......coinery overload An average 3 posts per day was just more than them those little ole forum cogs could bear! Shucks!

I've just realised, having earlier explained to a newcomer how they mustn't worry about the 'issue', and that I'd been on the forum for around a year and never witnessed any problems, that the forum broke down on my pre-decimal 1st birthday!

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/120987052366;jsessionid=4808E8FFE400C7781B5FCC01A9F9C3B1?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.co.uk%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_sacat%3D0%26_nkw%3D120987052366%26_rdc%3D1 Just found this in the 'completed listings' running 30 minutes behind the link above...naughty, naughty! http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Elizabeth-I-1562-sixpence-/120987273507?pt=UK_Coins_BritishHammered_RL&hash=item1c2b674923

Another £100 pi**ed against the wall! These are also arriving again in good numbers...that's 2 in a month that I'VE spotted, so there will have been others! http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HENRY-VIII-GROAT-TOWER-MINT-/261096503046?_trksid=p2047675.l2557&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&nma=true&si=cCzk6X4balcL%2F1rvoWDuCX2BHjA%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc

Yep. Bloody 'ell, Nick, I'm not the greatest fan of the Jubilee stuff, but that's a bit nice! Just right for colour, certainly to my taste!

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/120987052366;jsessionid=4808E8FFE400C7781B5FCC01A9F9C3B1?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.co.uk%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_sacat%3D0%26_nkw%3D120987052366%26_rdc%3D1

These are making a bit of a comeback in their various guises! Suddenly a bit of a glut about, they've been quiet for a while! Not just a copy, not EVEN a sixpence! Sorry, Richard, but 120987052366

Welcome DJMonty, Don't feel put off by the lack of response, there appears to be a few site technical difficulties! I've been onboard over a year now, and it's never happened before, so no big deal I don't think? Anyway, I've struggled to leave you this post, as it's been difficult to move through the links but, when the site's back to normal, have a browse through the books for sale here. The Check Your Change book has been highly recommended by many for those post-decimal rarities! Could be a good starting point!

And it's still not right! Think I'm going to give up again for a while!

I couldn't open the pages at all yesterday, or first thing this morning! Oh, and hilarious, Rob!

great read, I hope you're right! Should I buy everything up now?

261094905301 Ah, no. It says VF detail. And there is one small bit of it that could be considered to be VF! (Had you thought of getting a computer Stuart? They allow you to put in links and everything!) Oh, and I might mention that this seller has previously listed three (different) replica Charles I shillings as genuine, so he either doesn't know that much about what he sells, or he does. Either way, I'd be quite cautious about buying from him. 3 replicas, you've impressively got your finger on the pulse, I must say! I do have an abacus to play with

Nice VF Charles I Shilling! 261094905301

yes intellectual copyright applies to images taken by the author of material in his possesion.....however as much as intellectual copyright exists it can be controlled by corporate copyright. an example of this is when i photograph at premier league football matches, i own the intellectual copyright of the images i capture but am governed by the rules of the premier league, an example being the number of images i can post on my personal website without having to pay for a licence. the same applies to buildings, whilst i can capture images for example on national trust land and own the intellectual copyright of those images, what i can do with those images is controlled by the national trust and what licence i may have to pay them, for earning monies from their property. it is also possible to have your intellectual copyright removed in certain circumstances, such as under the terrorism laws if you were photographing a sensative subject such as a military installation, a government office block on the north bank of the thames!!!...... youre question though is clear cut......you owned the coin, you own the intellectual copyright to the image you captured. you can publish. Many thanks, Ski, much appreciated!

Depends on the coin and whether there are two or more people desperately seeking the variety. 6 or 7 years ago I had a nice Elizabeth 1 shilling pencilled in for a bid of 5 or 600 which was about right for the prices at the time, but it went to over 2K because two variety collectors were competing. The greater the number collecting a series, the greater the likelihood that prices will exceed expectations. In your experience, have you found the Elizabeth market consistent (mostly) regarding rarities (dates/Privy, etc.), I have recently seen a couple of examples of the rarer dates/PM's (both around 1:2 according to BCW) sell for around a third higher than their lesser-dated counterparts, would you say this ties in with your own observations?

Yes. It is your picture and you own the rights. The new owner only possesses the coin, just as you would own the rights to any image of a picture you took in a public place. A building may have belonged to many people over the years, but any images of it are only copyrighted by the person who took them. If not, you wouldn't find many images in newspapers, magazines, on the tv, or anywhere else. As always, Rob, common sense prevails! Thank-you!