Coinery

Ahh, yes, a good and logical shout, thank you

Strange isn’t it? Not a super-grade coin…I can’t imagine it being worthy of copying. I appreciate the overmark is of interest to a small minority, but otherwise nothing noteworthy about it in the context of the other specimens out there.

Ha, ha, yes, of course…it’ll probably be yours eventually Hope you’re all keeping well!

I agree, and I’m grateful it’s still deeply under the skin, it’s such a tangible and lovely art!

@Peckris 2 blimey…how do I resize an image on my iPhone? How are you, by the way?

Frustrating that uploading images I’ve just screenshot and cropped on my phone is SO difficult because they are apparently still too large!

Could be the remnants from an old die, possibly not ground back enough before punching up in readiness for a new coin?

Well spotted, I didn’t check out the reverse!

Hi CA, that’s basically just a jump in the die, causing a part of it to be double-struck. The A under V will be a bit of the W. If you look at the tops of the III’s you’ll see they’ve rotated too. Not rare or valuable, for me it makes it less desirable, though some out there rather like the miss-strikes. It’s actually not a bad little coin, keep enjoying it!

Would really love to know about the soft close on CGS in my other post if you have any experience or insights?

Ha ha, that really made me smile, brilliant! I’m so glad I asked 😊 Imagine at a coin club telling BCWs Chris Comber he was wrong about an Elizabeth three pence! That will make me chuckle ‘til Christmas and beyond! Thanks for that, Richard, have a great Christmas and a very happy new year! Best, Stuart

Was just reading through a few old posts and stumbled across this one! Of course CC has since died, but did you ever get to show him your coin?

However, extremely frustrating to watch it pass nonchalantly across the screen, leaving one helpless to do anything much about it! A bit like being on planet watch, only to watch helplessly as we screw that up too 🙁

Shocking behaviour...check out both images! https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/184720682573

For those who have spent more time than I looking at these coins, what’s your thoughts on the level of contact marks for the grade? I realise these are chunky old coins that are seldom seen with good surfaces...However, are these ‘mechanical’ marks too much for you?

Phenomenal coin!

In case anyone is interested? https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/284187934869

These books have now sold! Many thanks.

Definitely different lettering for me, especially when compared against Nick’s example.

So how would it be possible to distinguish between the pattern and the proof coin, with all devices being equal? Is that the main enquiry?

Many thanks for this! I too carried out a similar exercise with the LC past sales’ list and, as you point out, the differences are spectacularly small for a phenomenal increase in final value. The way these coins wear and are struck is many, with the example I shared having a much better fringe and front hair band than many GEF examples, confusing the variables of strike, wear, and die condition, much more than usual. I think you’re right re eye-appeal in these middling to better grades, it’s the best guide in the end.

Many thanks 🙏

@pokal02 & @VickySilver much appreciated! VS when you say takes it down to EF, I’m guessing that’s a typo for GEF?

Thanks for the input, ‘Peck.’ The feel for grade overall appears to be around NEF...I wonder if it just shakes shy of that? I could of course be blinded by the light of some of the examples that have rocketed in auction the last couple of years, I’m not sure? What’s your thoughts?

Available on eBay or PM me here https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/284177682085