Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Coinery

Expert Grader
  • Posts

    7,994
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    132

Everything posted by Coinery

  1. All a bit worrying, that’s for sure!
  2. I took some screen shots on my iPhone but the files are apparently too large, and I haven’t got access to a laptop/pc right now 😩 Really frustrating!
  3. You could actually buy a worthy coin with 4 of these washers!
  4. That’s standard punctuation but rotated…you can see it correctly orientated between DG AN
  5. Ahh, yes, a good and logical shout, thank you
  6. Strange isn’t it? Not a super-grade coin…I can’t imagine it being worthy of copying. I appreciate the overmark is of interest to a small minority, but otherwise nothing noteworthy about it in the context of the other specimens out there.
  7. Ha, ha, yes, of course…it’ll probably be yours eventually Hope you’re all keeping well!
  8. I agree, and I’m grateful it’s still deeply under the skin, it’s such a tangible and lovely art!
  9. @Peckris 2 blimey…how do I resize an image on my iPhone? How are you, by the way?
  10. Frustrating that uploading images I’ve just screenshot and cropped on my phone is SO difficult because they are apparently still too large!
  11. And there was me thinking, after selling ALL my coin books for a song, that I’d never buy a hammered (in fact any) coin again! I still love the Elizabeth I coins the best…blimey, I now need to buy a BCW again! 😳 In the meantime, anyone happy to share photos of the sixpence section, with the relevant rose, lions, shield and Lis bits at the back of the book to accompany?
  12. Could be the remnants from an old die, possibly not ground back enough before punching up in readiness for a new coin?
  13. Well spotted, I didn’t check out the reverse!
  14. Hi CA, that’s basically just a jump in the die, causing a part of it to be double-struck. The A under V will be a bit of the W. If you look at the tops of the III’s you’ll see they’ve rotated too. Not rare or valuable, for me it makes it less desirable, though some out there rather like the miss-strikes. It’s actually not a bad little coin, keep enjoying it!
  15. Would really love to know about the soft close on CGS in my other post if you have any experience or insights?
  16. Ha ha, that really made me smile, brilliant! I’m so glad I asked 😊 Imagine at a coin club telling BCWs Chris Comber he was wrong about an Elizabeth three pence! That will make me chuckle ‘til Christmas and beyond! Thanks for that, Richard, have a great Christmas and a very happy new year! Best, Stuart
  17. Was just reading through a few old posts and stumbled across this one! Of course CC has since died, but did you ever get to show him your coin?
  18. However, extremely frustrating to watch it pass nonchalantly across the screen, leaving one helpless to do anything much about it! A bit like being on planet watch, only to watch helplessly as we screw that up too 🙁
  19. Shocking behaviour...check out both images! https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/184720682573
  20. Definitely different lettering for me, especially when compared against Nick’s example.
  21. So how would it be possible to distinguish between the pattern and the proof coin, with all devices being equal? Is that the main enquiry?
  22. Many thanks for this! I too carried out a similar exercise with the LC past sales’ list and, as you point out, the differences are spectacularly small for a phenomenal increase in final value. The way these coins wear and are struck is many, with the example I shared having a much better fringe and front hair band than many GEF examples, confusing the variables of strike, wear, and die condition, much more than usual. I think you’re right re eye-appeal in these middling to better grades, it’s the best guide in the end.
×
×
  • Create New...
Test