Coinery

I thought Saltford was one of your recommended regulars? It only stands out for me as I lived for a number of years in Bath, and passed through Salford on my way to work in Bristol? Never met or dealt with them myself I must add!

I always thought you to be passionate about EVERY little detail of the series you collected?

Crafty old dog must be watching from the wings, then?

Yes, where is the old bean? I most expected him on the 'choice' thread, what with it being a GV HC in debate! Not like him at all! Anyone PM'd him?

Oh, dear! That old pewter threepence raises its ugly head, yet again!

Last one? You've only got six more days to wait until March!

We are talking at crossed purposes, Stuart. Dave's post references an 1862 florin, which is what I replied about. I agree with you, if we are talking godless 1849 florin. Oooooops, sorry Nick et al. God only knows how I crossed threads with that. I was recently reading the other godless thread, and just jumped to all kinds of fancy conclusions re this one!I humbly backtrack to my waterway hole!

"Extremely rare...almost impossible to locate in any grade"WHAT? They are rare and not easy to obtain, but I think I'd save his description for the 1863 florin. I have to say, that hasn't been my experience! Maybe they've got harder at the same time the gothic crown moved out of reach, I don't know, I'm pretty out of touch at the moment?I had a PCGS one for sale for ages...nearly gave it away to Japan in the end! Had an obliterated ww that didn't go anywhere fast, either.

"Extremely rare...almost impossible to locate in any grade"WHAT?

Doesn't miss a trick, does that canny Scot!

Some lovely presentation going on in this thread!

Think I paid £120 for mine. Nice old lump!

He certainly went for bust with a 1936 penny! Wow!

It looks like it's spent some time in water, sea or river, as it's rather smoothed? Also, without seeing the other side, there looks to be a plugged edge-hole at 9 O'clock? Nice bit of history, but not a collector's piece if there are better examples around for a few extra quid. Thanks for bringing it on here, though! Talking of Edwards, I was staggered to find a beautiful tomb in Gloucester Cathedral last week, which belongs to Edward II. I instantly wanted to collect Edward II coins, just to build on the sense of history I felt, standing before this king's burial spot! Amazing!

Bet Declan kept stum in the company of that lot? Good band, must catch them myself!

Welcome aboard potlings! I guess we don't need to introduce ourselves, as you've already had a good look around! You've done the right thing choosing pre-decimal, however, best education in coins you'll ever receive! It's true!

Yes, agreed!

Nice coin, and good price!

Oh, that's just horrible!

I totally agree with your last sentence. However, I can't follow the idea that a weakly struck coin, fresh out of the mint, couldn't attract the truth of its status as UNC?

Not true! I think it's very high grade with faults! If somebody advertised that as GEF (maybe even AU) with weak strike and a couple of detracting marks, I'd say their statement would be fair! CGS seem to have forgotten to factor the issues into their numerical stamp! But we all know why, don't we?

I'm going to go higher! The obverse eyebrow would normally be very much flattened if the wear on the ear was actually wear. Eyebrow looks good and, in view of the weakness in the reverse shield, I'm going weak ear, not worn. The reverse looks barely worn at all to me, I'd go GEF, maybe AU (but would like an in-hand look at the lustre on the high points for that)! From a CGS point of view, I don't think they should've graded it anything like that high if they are supposedly knocking coins down for strike and damage.......IMHO

Crickey Moses, nothing like waving a flag for bag marks! They're being stored in a box of sand, by the looks of it! Looks to be about 400 grit from the images?

I'll get my coat, then! I Q-tip everything with acetone, and have never seen a white-out, yet! Anyway, all that aside, thank-you for the info.