Paulus

Seuk is rarely wrong ...

It has taken me a good long while to find a circulation half crown I am happy with, when it comes to grade, strike and eye appeal. I have now done so and the half crowns that did not make the grade so-to-speak are up for sale (not on eBay as yet) I now want to do the same for circulation 1911-1919 Florins This is not my best example, and it is a rarer date, but it illustrates well what I am after - a much stronger set of lions' faces at 12 o/c on the reverse! If any of you out there know of a better one or have one for sale please PM me .

Nice one Nick, that takes the lead in my book!

These are difficult for sure, I'm sure there are collectors on here that have got examples they acquired 20-30 years ago for a pittance, let's see em! Anyway the search goes on for me, here is my best Rev currently, let's have some more healthy competition

Mine (your new one) is winging its way to you Pete

Hi Marston, if you're on Facebook you may want to join the group 'Coin Grading Services (CGS) Collectors', Bill Pugsley has posted detailed information on what the LCGS site currently offers

I agree with that Oz, but keeping the faith that there are better strikes out there! This is unlikely to be my keeper,but nonetheless interested in views on this!

Agree with 9 over over 9 if anything, but various die issues gets my vote!

Do you have any pictures you could post?

Double-struck for me

When I could access the site, there was a member 'senrac' (yes with an N not an M) with a goodly number of CGS graded coins ... just an observation!

Not as far as I know, £2-8-80-185 in F to UNC (Spink 2015)

A farthing ... something wrong?

The number to call is now the number for London Coins, they will definitely answer!

Bill has posted extensively in his Facebook Group 'Coin Grading Services (CGS) Collectors'

I'm in South London so there are several fairs, not been for a while though

I think Rob attends, for one

I agree with that SS. It's the proposal that in order to verify a CGS coin you have to be a member, at whatever cost and inconvenience, that will be a barrier to trading in them, whether buying or selling - that's the killer for me. I'm also interested in Rob's comment, that the number of 'iffy' items is the same in the US as it is here ... I had assumed it was FAR more of an issue over there!

The database pretty much looks after itself. It's the cost of employing people to provide the service when on average they have slabbed 4,000 coins per year at a charge of around £15 per coin (on average) - annual revenue from slabbing therefore around £60k. The fee is a flawed attempt at turning a profit.

Fundamental flaw is exactly what it is in my book! It wouldn't be quite so bad if they kept the verification function free and charge a fee for access beyond that ...

Acquired yesterday, seller's pics.

That, I think, is the biggest issue with this change

Total carnage Train wreck

This is the same pricing model, pretty much, they had briefly before their £500 lifetime membership brainwave