scottishmoney

It is a Hindu temple token from India, from ca. the 19th or early 20th century.

I like coins that fill out the design with many details. One of my favourite British coins has always been the Nobles that were minted during the 14th century: This is from Edward III(1327-1377) and is S-1502. But alas this will be a short timer in my collection as it is one of the pieces I will part with in the next few months to fund a new philanthropic endeavour.

With all dues, one is going to look at a listing askance from a seller with a pecuniary feedback thus. Anymore I have my settings on the fleaBay such that I see the feedback percentage and count with the page listing, and won't even look at auctions such as the above mentioned. All the while a start at £25 will be a put off to the most, even though the coins surely are worth more. People like 50p or £1 starts, not £25. In summary, good luck.

Right humourous indeed since I got a PM from said individual expressing a desire to sell them to the parsimonious Scot, like with humour he would think he would get more dosh from the Scot than the Anglishman ! Oh my a chuckle this evening an' I'll think about it wi' my 84 bob beverage.

Okay

Right now I am dealing with a seller I paid like seconds after the auction, two weeks pass, and still no item. I love these idiots.

I wouldn't have bid on it in the first place if the postage was too high. I cannot get over how many people here in the USA charge a whopping $8 or about £4.75 to post a banknote. I won't bid on their items period. That is just usury, and they often will spend no more than $2 to mail it. Where you can hit them on the feedback, if you cannot give a neutral is to leave a positive, but note the outrageous postal expense and hit them in the ratings star thing they have in the feedback module. I did that with the seller above that charged $12(for registered) but spent $4.95 to post the item via priority mail.

Don't discard the possibility that the coin is NOT cupro-nickel, but has been chemically treated to lighten the surface. I have seen this done with cents and pennies before.

Yes, I have been using the cross technique and have acquired the skill of pinpointing a bit better. At first I had some construction size excavations going on with half hour digging and sifting. Now I sit and mess with the machine in differing directions to isolate the signal to a particular point. Admittedly I have not savoured the thought of depth detection yet, so most of the older stuff I might find might could still be hiding from my clutches.

Since my side pursuit is 17th century tokens, I would love to TH over there. I would rather find a nice one of those than rose farthings etc. Most of my 17th century tokens are TH finds. I recently got an Irish token that was found in Shropshire with all of the "Treasure Trove" etc. paperwork on it, noting when found, by whom etc. It was a 1672 token from Dublin, and had travelled quite a bit to rural Shropshire whence it was lost apparently. I am kind of surprised it got reported, not being part of a hoard, but perhaps because it was a bit unusual to find something like that in Shropshire.

Not so far. I have found several cupro nickel dimes and quarters though. I haven't gotten around to playing with the more sensitive settings yet, because I want to find a sifting screen and pointer so I don't have to excavate the whole backyard.

I got a detector a couple of months ago, and have only used it in my yard. But I live in an older home, so I found a 1917 cent, and several other 50+ year old coins. Also found pretty interesting old tools that must have been used when the house was built 75 years ago.

Not exactly a Russia fan, I speak Russian, but my family is... part Ukrainian! Україна - частина Європи, не частина Росії!

Technically speaking Charles I, but they were struck in 1644, 1648, and then in 1650, so could be one of the posthumous coins. Scotland was not part of the Commonwealth, but only influenced to some extent by Cromwellian troops crossing the borders from time to time to remind the Scots that autonomy gained by the Civil War and execution of the King had limitations.

Sounds a lot like a Scottish bodle or 2d, but will need to see an image to nail it down to whether it was Charles I or Charles II. These are usually pretty heavily worn, they circulated into the 1750's as farthings after the 1707 Union. Here are some images of Scottish bodles: Charles I This above is a contemporary counterfeit of the first coinage. Posthumous coinage, ca. 1650. I don't currently have a bodle of Charles II imaged yet.

The first piece is a Scottish groat, the monarch is either David II or Robert II, cannot tell because the image is too small, and I cannot read the legend on the coin, the bust looks a bit more Robert II'ish though. The second piece appears to be 16th century French of Henri II or Henri III.

I have earlier proto-monies from the Skythian cultures, but this is the earliest that is actually a coin in the strict definition of coin: Ionia, Miletos 1/12th of a stater, approximately 600 BC, silver and 7mm in diameter, a typically small coin from an era when coins were very very small.

Perhaps it is the draggy appearance of Georgie that made the seller refer to as such.

Being offered and actually selling are two distinctly different things, I canna see proffering that kind of dosh for a wee box, wi'out the goldie nae less.

If your seller doesn't accommodate, but you are happy with the coins, I would leave a positive feedback, but note the overcharge on the postage, and rate the transaction with the stars accordingly. I did this a couple of months ago with a Canadian seller that charged C$12 to send item registered from Canada, then turned around and sent it US Priority mail from his USA address, cost US $4.95. The item was great, but I was chaffed they took a profit on the postage.

I have never had that happen with a seller, usually they are pleased as punch to combine shipping and make a happy customer.

Edward VII was a rather randy old chap, I rather believe it him than his more staid son.

Tiny Scottish Islet Declares Independence

Ex mount looks a bit more attractive to most if it is done professionally and not haphazardly but the coin will not have any increase in value as a result. So I canna tell you not to have it performed, but do recommend getting someone that knows what they are doing first.

It does certainly appear French, but very well could have come to Britain then and even been used as a token still. Curiously some found in Britain were made in what is now Germany. Unfortunately while it is possible to roughly date the pieces based on what is on them, further identification ie where exactly made and by whom gets much more difficult. Conjecture is the name of the game with these. They are very enigmatic.