Sword

I heard on the radio this morning that the amendment would "pave the way" for a bill if it pass. However, Labour has just announced that it is prepared to back a new Brexit referendum. I think it is looking likely now that Cooper / Letwin vote will pass and a second referendum will happen. Personally, I think this is the least bad of all the options. Labour has also missed a trick I think. If they were prepared to back a new referendum before the no confidence vote, then May might have been toppled. A Corbyn led Labour government is .... 😱 😢😭💀

I am not totally clear with the of Cooper/Letwin vote. If it is just an amendment, then isn't it true that it will not be legally binding even if it gets voted through? Or are they trying to get it through as a bill so that it will eventually become legislation?

"MPs to have final vote by 12 March, says May". https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47348610 Truly frightful! And if May is defeated, there will be just 2 weeks to sort out a plan! Then I guess no deal or 2nd referendum will be the most probable outcomes. Hardly any point in an extension unless one can put forward a good reason why the extra time would make any difference.

I too lost the use of my dvd drive on my old laptop after an upgrade. My current laptop doesn't have a dvd drive.

Looks OK to me. Carbon spots are less distracting on the reverse and they are not in focal areas (except the single spot on Britannia's hand). And a coin always looks better when it didn't cost very much :)

High grade LCA's choice English coins for direct sale is almost invariably quite / very expensive.

It's working again. I think there were just updating the site.

They should do the honorable (but less profitable) thing of declaring such objects as medals rather than coins.

That's crossed my mind too. Could be due to the help of a Royal Mint employee? Might be it is worth reporting to the RM and see how they respond?

I understand why people might like to collect decimal coins. Indeed, I might buy a silver set of the current circulating coins at some point. I guess I just don't accept a piece of metal with a painted Gruffalo as a "coin". If the Royal mint were to produce some porcelain discs with the Gruffalo painted on one side would that also be accepted as a "coin" by some?

Who would actually want such a thing. A child would surely prefer a soft toy Gruffalo. (I brought one for my nephew when we went to see the Gruffalo show in a theater). A teenager would want the £65 (or even £30) than such an object. I would not comment on any grown-ups buying for themselves ...

Stay around. It's very possible to have a hobby in interesting and rare coins without physically owning them.

"I want a million for a house". Then it was "I want 180K for a chip shop". And now a starting price of £5 with no mention of house or shop. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ONE-OF-A-KIND-MAJOR-ROYAL-MINT-DIE-SHARD-STRIKE-ERROR-2017-12-SIDED-1-COIN/123657536635?hash=item1cca90447b:g:kxAAAOSw11Bb3aql:rk:32:pf:0

I am sure you are right with regard to the more scratch resistant plastic. However, this is not mentioned on the Gold Shield site. https://www.pcgs.com/goldshield From what I can see, the Gold Shield Slab looks very similar to other PCGS slabs ...

One idea is to have tamper proof edging which holds the two pieces of glass together and protect the slab from drops. The two pieces of glass separates when the edging is removed.

It is rather sad that so many people only care about the number on the slab rather than what the coin (and even less what the slab) looks like. Can you imagine the insult of putting for example a Charles I Oxford Crown in a plastic slab? If one were to slab such a treasure, it should be between two pieces of sapphire glass at least!

I have wondered if TPGs will offer super deluxe slabs for very valuable coins in the future. E.g. non scratch glass instead of cheap plastic. It does look strange to slab a 50 or 100k coins in some cheap plastic that is easy to scratch.

UNC with cabinet friction is one of those self-contradictory term. There is wear but it could be due to mishandling rather than circulation. Sure.

It is a matter of seeing any old man with a goatee one wants to see. 😀

Perhaps. I admit Lenin was the first thing to come to mind.

Reverse of the coin:

Although I don't know anything about Soviet coins, I am inclined to think it is not Lenin. I find it hard to believe that Soviet coins would bear a portrait of Lenin in 1943. Surely it would not have been PC to have a soviet leader on a coin like the Tsars before. The CCCP emblem would be much more appropriate. E.g.

Forum member Madness came to mind too. 😀 And he still logs into regularly.

He states "As winning bidder if you are not happy and return the item to me I will refund your purchase price and postage costs without question". I have a suspicion he might not be honoring that promise.

That phrase generally mean giving advice to someone who is more expert in a particular area. But then again, I do find it useful for friends to occasionally emphasise things I already know. Articles / sites on fakes are so instructive and entertaining for collectors of all levels! It will be greatly appreciated by all.