PWA 1967

There is a reason but i wont bore you with that on here...........John/Stephen/Satin/Topcarp Still the same person 😂

His name is Stephen..........hence the reason i called him Mr Jerrams 😊

Believe me.......😄

Its Mr.Jerrams Mike...........Satin 😉

Well he is willing to swap it for something 😊 I cant really think of anything i have got though , maybe i will have have a look in the rubbish bin. I wonder how much there head must be messed up to even go to the trouble of listing them 😮

I think the thief will of been just as negged out as the owner when he opened the box , hopefully the owner got his insurance which would perhaps of been more than the true value and more use to the family. Why on earth they put this on the news weeks later makes me think not much goes on in Plymouth 😉

The 1951 has gone 😉

https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/alfnail/m.html?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEFSXS%3AMESOI&_trksid=p2053788.m1543.l2654 Thought i would put these here as although they are not mine ,possibly something a bit different for someone or a new collector 😉

Yes i believe you Peck 😊 just me thinking out loud and not having a clue that if a coin was made up of 45% Copper for one year it may be that some are a different colour. Will just call it toning

I just went off Eric mentioning proof and the top of the page saying it was also ,maybe i got that bit confused 😉 The colour maybe more along the lines of the metal mix and the reason sometimes you see tiny flecks of verd that have got into the metal. On Michael goubys website he says...... "different mixes were tried for silver coins from 1920 and again in 1922" The mix for 1920 being Half silver and half Cupro nickel.......The cupro nickel being 90% copper and 10% Nickel. Maybe i am way off the mark ............... on his website he does go into more detail on other years. Pete. Some of this probably does not make sense now you have edited your post Mike 😂

Maybe the metal mix for proofs was different allowing for a better strike and the reason for the colour.Not collecting silver i dont have a clue but was told that some 1920 Florins have a higher silver content and although much scarcer these tend to have a much better strike. Perhaps none of it is correct and someone may correct me saying its wrong 😊

I found that using either petrol or acetone will dissolve/remove anything on the coin and when left to dry will leave a whitish waxy looking area in places.this can be seen more clearly the more residue that was on in the first place.Using distilled water straight after putting anything on should help remove it more thoroughly ,put the coin in the water in a plastic tub,swish it around for a minute then pat dry with a lint free cloth. Better not to do anything in the first place but if the coin is already ruined it cant really appear much worse regardless of what you do 😉 Everyone uses different methods including three in one oil for silver which if only a tiny amount may help. I would think most of the years you mention you can pick up cheaply ,so maybe worth just replacing them before spending a few quid on cleaning stuff .

1895 CGS 82 BU £125......£85 1951 CGS 82 Currency BU £75........£55 1898 PCGS MS65RB........ £95 Prices include postage. Pete.

I know that auction houses may wish to set a low estimate to generate interest but a recent sale i have just been reading about (coin news) must of put a smile on the sellers face. An elderley lady whos husband had passed away took some banknotes wrapped in tissue paper to Tring market auction based in Hertfordshire. The late husband had been given the notes years earlier. Auction estimate was set at £500-700. Quite a lot of interest as they sold due to the specimen notes for...........£205,000.00 😮. I bet the lady enjoyed a drink that night 😂

Yes i suppose......I have just phoned Dave craddock aswell thinking maybe it was him and i had got mixed up, but the best one he has ever had was only VF 😊

I have just put the phone down Mike ............ Think he is probably as daft as me although atleast we had a laugh about it. "i have not got one pete" i am sure thats what he told me although it was a while ago ,anyway sorry about that and stops me wanting to buy something off him that he does not have 😂 Pete.

I Will ask him tomorrow and check its ok first 😊

I know of an UNC F69 with almost full lustre.............Although he wont sell it me ☹️

The other 1939 has gone also. Sorry to interupt and i also like the designs of the crowns 😊. Pete.

Yes unfortunately i think it will be correct ,although yes the fees are high 😊 The commision of 20% plus if you convert to english pounds the £70 for the other bits and pieces. I think looking in Australia you dont have to pay any customs ,although i may be wrong and that would of bumped it up even more. I am sure the amount to pay will be broken down and will be exactly what it says in there terms. Unfortunately you will just have to pay them and one of those lessons most of us have learned at some point.

The group of three has gone 😊 Just the 1939 BU CGS 82 on its own left for £20 Posted. 1895 BU CGS 82 £87 posted.................PM me for pictures if interested 1951 BU CGS 82 currency £55 posted Pete.

Dont know if these are any use to anyone. 1939 BU CGS 82 1953 BU CGS 82.....Currency 1970 CGS 90 £33 for the three posted. Also a 1939 on its own BU CGS 82 £20 Pete.

What a bell end and shows that Sun ,beer and water can end in an accident 😂

The power of the forum ..........He sold this Monday morning to a forum member 🙂

I think Blake considering it was way before the internet Mr freeman did a fantastic job from the resources he had. F69 R16...........51-100 Estimate. F76 R17............16-50 Estimate. I have a book that belonged to Mr freeman of which inserted there are numerous typed out details of estimates and prices that was done in the seventies. An amazing insight researched by looking at thousands of loose pennies in hand of all grades.