Colin G.

Oops

You're welcome - I only found about this from 1887Jubilee who identified one of my 1887s as that! There are a few farthings where an I has been used to recut/strengthen the upright of a letter on a die, but there is a clear diagonal line on that one and also something just above the front foot of the R. They may just be cracks as a result of the strengthening, because I can not think of any other letter..but it may be worth a closer look!!

I have found adobe dreamweaver to be very simple to use and it allows you to easily toggle between html views and design views, so you can drag and drop and tweak coding where required. It also allows you to prview in firefox and IE because you would be amazed how a site can look great in one, and is all over the place in the other, it's a bloody pain trying to get them to look exactly the same!!! You would think they would interpret html the same way!!!

Dave just google button generators and create your own however you want them!!

Nice one. looks like shes got a big wart on her cheek as well. bet she doesent know about this special portrait of her. lol. dont think she would be amused Ive come across A few coins that seem to have little bumps in them,has any body came across any of these? I would guess that this may be a result of the coins being steel cored with plating, and therefore an impurity may be commencing reaction/corrosion beneath the plating...not sure but it would seem a plausible explanation. I think 2008 2p's and 2010 onwards 5p's were plated steel

Azdas wallet It looks like it could be a planchet flaw or post mint damage, I would go with planchet flaw because it has that flaked look

I'm glad you said most. We're not all like that, I can assure you. That's the thing Clive, he does as much damage for the reputation of archaeologists as he does detectorists. As you can probably see the man has knack of winding folk up

You have there a Rose farthing of Charles I

The 5 looks very similar to the 5's found on the farthings from the 1850's

Says i have to wait up to 24hrs before i can play. Best go and start on the Penny pics Dave just noticed you have a typo in the web address in your signature Spoilsport !

Says i have to wait up to 24hrs before i can play. Best go and start on the Penny pics Dave just noticed you have a typo in the web address in your signature

Welcome to the wonderful world of websites....its nearly as time consuming as coins

Oh in that case £45

I don't even collect pennies but I will throw £30 at it

Dave when you get the domain name you can the set up your own e-mails on that domain. For example I can issue any e-mail addresses with aboutfarthings.co.uk at the end. You will get the mail servers as part of the hosting package.

Thats who I use but all these companies you need to have your wits about you, if you forget to renew they get the domain and then you can buy it back off them for a nominal fee of about £80

I think siteground will throw one in, but they tend to be cheap enough anyway. As Garry has said £10 for two years ish!!

I agree with a vast majority of what you are saying Tom, treasure items take 18 months to 2 years to go through the process, and a vast majority of what is recorded has been recorded voluntarily and not because it needs to be by legislation. The trouble is if detectorists don't record then they are accused of stashing hoards of treasures away, and self interest and if they do record it becomes an admin nightmare. UKDFD does try to hit that middle ground and does not accept everything, whereas PAS records everything!! Damned if we do and damned if we don't!! Detecting gets a lot of bad press and a lot of it is undeserved.

Dave, It is a good deal in terms of trying web hosting, and seeing whether a website is for you. I genuinely can not fault the service I have for the price paid and whilst I try to sort most things out myself, the couple of problems I have needed help with, they have sorted out very quickly. The two areas I would complian about is teh auto renew, which like you say most companies do nowadays, but I just find it a bit sneaky, and the help section has lots of FAQ's and you have to be pretty determined to find a way through the FAQ's to get to "log a ticket" and speak to a person, but when you do it they respond within minutes. They offer web templates and you also get a free shopping cart, such as Zencart, OS Commerce etc, which can be a bugger to set up, but a great challenge if you are into that sort of stuff. Time consuming but very rewarding!! The usual price after the offer has expired is about £60-70 a year depending on the exchange rates for their basic package, but it does what I need it to!!

You have to your wits about you all the time nowadays!!

Erm what link, I didn't see one, and i just emailed you too. The one in the post above

By using the link, they set up a direct debit you just cancel it

Copied from my host "siteground" http://www.siteground.com/friends.htm?referrer_id=41731 They give one year of hosting and free website transfer for $9.95 only! The offer is not publicly available and is much better than their current website price for the same service. If you sign I will also receive a free month of hosting! Whether it is the best deal you can get from them I don't know, I have always been impressed with them, and yes there is an incentive for me to encourage you to use them. They do the usual "try to get you to auto renew" etc. but as long as you are savvy it is no problem

Paul Barford is a troll nothing more nothing less, he is detested by both the vast majority of archaeologists and detectorists alike. He manipulates and twists every quote on every subject to his advantage, and is very good at what he does, including removing comments from his blog that he does not agree with. It is not a forum for debate when one side can manipulate and remove comments made by the other, that is why it reads so convincingly. As for a true representation of current thinking on detecting and archaeology....... Just look at the PAS database and see what percentage of finds in the last few years have been made and recorded by detectorists including the great Staffordshire hoard which would still not have seen the light of day. Yes there are those few within the hobby who carry out illegal activities but that is true of most if not all hobbies, and why should the innocent majority who are genuinely interested in amateur archaeology be punished. The PAS database funded by the government is a nightmare, just try searching for records. Detectorists have taken to funding their own to run parallel - UKDFD, try searching that one in comparison!! Be careful with Mr Barford Tom, he would have your collection in a museum drawer only to be looked at by the educated few quicker than a flash if he had his way Sorry if this post seems a bit blunt but I have seen the damage Mr Barford can do!!