|
The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com |
|
-
Content Count
1,498 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
50
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Michael-Roo
-
Where about in Liverpool are you detecting?
-
Yeah. Unfortunately, its quite pitted, isn't it.
-
I bought that one on ebay for £23 around three years ago.
-
Yours doesn't look so bad. As you say, its a little worn but, clearly, it had been a nice strong strike.
-
Here's one of the heavier examples I have. 28.5-29mm. 11.9g.
-
spot the expensive mistake
Michael-Roo replied to copper123's topic in Confirmed unlisted Varieties.
Nope. What is it? -
Although your coin is certainly at the top end it is still within the accepted diameter and weight ranges for the 1694s. I have several of these heavier examples too. I don't think our coins are particularly unusual. Just in case you're not familiar with Nicholson's notes (though you probably are!), here's the link. http://www.colincooke.com/coinpages/nicholson_part1.html
-
Hi all. I'd very much welcome your thoughts on this one. A 1718 dump halfpenny displaying three distinct anomalies. First: No stops on the obverse. A well documented variety, but certainly scarce. Second: E over B in REX (or possibly even B instead of E). This is unrecorded in Peck, and the only reference I can find is an example listed in a St. James auction (similar grade to mine but showing some corrosion). There isn't one in the Nicholson collection. Third: The coin is on a broad flan. All my other 1717 and 1718 halfpennies are approximately 26mm in diameter. This one is 27.5mm. Have any of you seen anything similar? Thanks very much.
-
Thanks for your input Scott.
-
Yes. Thank you Rob. I see the Nicholson 172 is the same diameter. Mine is much more 'irregular' in shape though? Do you have anything to add regarding the no stops and E over B?
-
The E/B in Rex does indeed match the B in Britannia. Please compare with the St. James auction coin.
-
1807 Half penny value and grade
Michael-Roo replied to Charlie's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Of course! Paulus, you're right. 1790s token halfpennies are a great suggestion. So much social and political history to explore. In fact, your mentioning them has me reaching for the tray right now…... -
1807 Half penny value and grade
Michael-Roo replied to Charlie's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Paulus: You're right on both counts. 1887 silver can still be found at bargain prices. In higher grades the 1807 halfpenny is harder to come by than the 1806. However, at £20, your 1806 was a good buy. -
1807 Half penny value and grade
Michael-Roo replied to Charlie's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Don't worry about it Charlie. Everyone of us bought 1887 silver when we were starting out. Even the members who now spend squilions on coins. -
1807 Half penny value and grade
Michael-Roo replied to Charlie's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Nice. Be sure to check though what you have from your Grandfather for rarities. Wreath crowns. H and KN pennies. 1946 and 49 threepenny bits etc. If you find you have a 1905 half crown your Grandpa was a canny bloke . -
Here's a photo of the reverse. Sorry, its not the greatest pic ever uploaded on the forum. However, I thought it worth adding to show how prominent the stop after Britannia is compared with the lack of stops on the obverse. Also: look at that border/rim. This is a dump halfpenny. Have you ever seen one so broad?!?!
-
Just had a look. Maybe a few minor differences? The ties certainly seem to be different. Possibly a slight difference in the placing of the letters too? The border on my coin is obviously much broader too.
-
I have to be honest Stuart, die matching always leaves me a bit puzzled. They all look the same to me . However, I'll go back now and look at them side by side. Any thoughts re the broad flan?
-
1807 Half penny value and grade
Michael-Roo replied to Charlie's topic in British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
Welcome Charlie. I agree. Nearly VF. A nice coin to start the hobby with. Do you have any others we could take a look at for you? -
Scott, you're usually spot on, but this time I would beg to differ. Look at these two cropped images. The first is the E in Georgius. The second the E in Rex. They are completely different. The second has no trace of an upper horizontal bar or serif. Edit: I have no idea why the second image has appeared here upside down. Its the right way up on my desk top!
-
That's a really interesting coin! It looks to me as if there's a bottom serif sticking out the bottom loop of the B-shape. If you look at the E in George, that also exhibits B-like qualities, but looks more E-like?The whole die and/or punches look very tired. So, is it an E with a damaged/curved bottom bar, or a B punch refashioned (for God knows what reason) to make an emergency E? Or B/E? Food for thought! The serifs of the E in Georgius do indeed display unusual wee spreads and bends but the corresponding letter in Rex has strong 'B' loops. Exactly the same as the St. James coin.
-
Count me in. Three for two….. Sounds like a Tesco offer .
-
Here's a link to the St. James coin. http://stjauctions.com/assets/applets/SJA13part5.pdf
-
Hi Scott. What do you mean. 'With an E'?
-
Cheers Stuart. I find this one fascinating, so I'm really pleased to get your expert input. You're right. The the condition isn't all that bad, its the punch/strike which looks a little tired. Doesn't explain the broad flan though. Very odd. Have you seen another? Thanks again.