jelida

Hi all, Any more opinions regarding the 145 tooth F10? Has MG expressed a view, Richard? I have scoured the net and not found any more. I still think there has been work in the hair around the nape of the neck. I am attaching images to try and demonstrate this. The first is my 145 tooth F10, then Terry's. Then 143 tooth F10's from Heritage, R Ingrams and LCA. And finally a F15 'Gouby G' revision (138 tooth) without the 'tuft' of hair at the nape for comparison. Your thoughts welcomed. Jerry

In fact this coin was my only really decent Obverse 2, so for fine detail on 'normal' type 2 obverses I am relying on net pictures. There may be an issue of die wear on the examples I am looking at, but is there perhaps a difference in the detail in the hair to the lower left of the bun, and in the 'tuft' of hair on the nape of the neck to the left of the ribbon knot? Apart from the strange colon dots, I cant see any other possibilities. Does anybody have a really crisp Obv 2 die picture? Jerry

I am not aware that mine came via London Coin Auctions, I bought it at the Midland Coin Fair, mostly because of the dramatic die repairs on some letters. It does appear to have the same die pairing as yours, Terry. Does the die flaw through Victoria's hair match yours? Interesting to note the prevalence you have noted. Have you communicated with Michael Gouby? Jerry

This is my F10, 145 tooth obverse. I think Terry has found something really interesting here, and I agree a great first post! Jerry

I meant reverse d variants, not obverse 2, and of course there's no reason for them to be associated, counting teeth clearly affected my reason, hopefully temporarily! The tally of obverse 2's is now three at 143 and one at 145 teeth, recounted to check. I think I feel sick..... Jerry

Hmmm, just counted 145 teeth on one of mine which has the colon dots the same as yours, and 143 on a different Obverse 2 penny. And 138 teeth on an obverse 3. Gouby does state that obv 2 has 143, and obv 3 has 138, so that tallies; Do other members have 145 tooth obverse 2's? I wonder whether they tie in with a particular one of the previously described four obv 2 variants? Paul Holland doesnt seem to have counted the teeth when describing these variants in his BNJ article. Eyes a bit befuddled by dot counting now,will try again later. Jerry

This is terrible news, Peter, terrible. I am so sorry for you and your family. Stay strong and share your feelings. With our fondest wishes, Jerry & Libby.

Does look like a F21, with the colon after G of DG pointing to a gap, well done, a rare coin with significant value even in that condition. I think the 4 plus G is correct also. Jerry

Deffo a dot. Keep it. Jerry

Certainly the stalagtites and solid flows would suggest lime bearing water, thus alkaline; from my MD experience bronze seems to survive better in alkaline environments, but would still patinate over time. Where I have found Roman coins, shiny and uncorroded as on the day they were dropped, is in the anoxic mud of the Severn Estuary, so a significant sedimentation process might help. Jerry

no PC on this forum, please......... Jerry

That is a stunning collection! I think I've only got 3 pennies you would want! Not sure if thats a smile or a frown ( cant find the blessed emoticons on my eyepad today). Jerry

Yes, I bid over £1300 for the 1860 penny, and two others rated it higher, despite its faults. But I still have plenty of less esoteric pennies to spend my money on. Did a forum member win it? Jerry

Well, it might be the photos, but I cant see the gap between the R and the I of BRITT, so apparently not. Jerry

I think its the norm, the others on the net seem the same, but the 6 (not the one) definitely seems larger than the rest. Jerry

That was my first impression too, though I've just checked mine and it is the same, 6 and possibly 1 both look larger. Is this the norm? Need to look at more. Jerry

This vendor has already sold one Scarborough Siege piece for £100 according to his feedback, the buyer is really pleased as he has had it assessed and it is real! Bo***cks! Jerry

And yet I would say that the pic on the left is the more 'correct', though I would lighten it a touch; it has a more even balance, without the glare and 'white out' of some of the highlights of the pic on the right. It is the left pic that would be chosen for a catalogue. Jerry

Surprised not to see any replies from the hammered guys on the forum; from my limited knowledge I would say that the James shilling is exceptionally nice, good flan and nice even strike, at least VF for me. The groat is more 'run of the mill' I would say, a nice coin but a little short of flan , and these can be found better; still a good example, and again a good VF. But I would then have to be guided by Spink as regards price; any idea of what is being asked? C'mon, lets have some proper experts! Jerry

I had actually tried to work out from the sun whether it was morning or evening, eventually deciding that only a madman would have got up voluntarily that early. I felt this to be confirmed by the fact that I have booked to catch a bus at 05.45 to get to the London coin fair in a couple of weeks. There's dedication! Keep posting! Jerry

Does have a slightly 'unofficial' look to it, but doesn't look like a modern fake to me. I presume it's a detecting find? Jerry

Absolutely beautiful! Amazed at the stability of the platform offered by these machines, though looks to have been a still evening. You live in a wonderful area, though I see even German palace lawns are plagued by moles! Jerry

Obverse 6, reverse G, one of the commonest varieties. To be fair to him, I see that he did re-list it correctly this morning, good man. We do all make mistakes, perhaps it was inadvertant. Jerry

I'm sure many of the coins are fine, and he does start them cheaply. I can only comment on the pennies here, but since xmas he has (presumably inadvertently) on a number of occasions misattributed Victorian pennies, identifying mundane coins as excessively rare Freeman varieties , I have yet to see him do the opposite but do check his coins as presumably he will get it wrong in the other direction eventually! This coin was the latest example, but I see he has cancelled the auction today, perhaps it will be relisted correctly described. Or am I 'ever the optomist?' Jerry

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Penny-1861-Freeman-28-dies-5-G-Very-Rare-rated-R18-by-Freeman-/331634213605?hash=item4d36f082e5 Ever the optomist! Usually wrong. Jerry