Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

jelida

Accomplished Collector
  • Posts

    1,854
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    112

Everything posted by jelida

  1. Will do, but now you guys have got me puzzled. According to my copy of Freeman, the 1985 one, the 1874 date halfpenny (with or without H) only occurs with obverses 7, 8,9 and 10. Has this been revised? Dont forget we are looking at halfpennies here, not the pennies I am more familiar with. Jerry
  2. Is it to do with the stops? There is a colon between D and G, but a definite single stop between the G and the R of REX, is this unusual? Jerry
  3. I'd go with 9J, after pondering Freeman for 15 minutes. Jerry
  4. It was nice to meet you briefly at the Midland Coin Fair, there is almost something of interest, and its the quarterly 'biggie' in December. Decent coins. Jerry
  5. True, it cant be reverse 'E' , so shouldnt be a 'B'. Either a squiffy 'A' or nothing, then. Jerry
  6. http://www.predecimal.com/forum/topic/8190-1862-half-penny-dl-a-any-ideas/ Here is a link to one previously discussed on this forum. Jerry
  7. The 'letter' appears to have a vertical in the vertical plane of the lighthouse, hence 'B' for me, though it could be an 'A' at 45 degrees angle, as Paulus shows, but the letters I thought were usually correctly aligned, though I accept halfpennies are not really my thing . Jerry
  8. Does look like a letter to me, but so difficult to be sure on these worn coins. Is there enough detail to clarify which Freeman reverse it has? Can you see an 'LCW' anywhere? If it is a letter, I would go for ' B'. Really need better close-up pics. Jerry
  9. The half farthing is the same coin in both pics; did the seller describe it as E over N? If he did, and its not, ask for your money back! Jerry
  10. Look OK to me. But do go for good condition and/or rarity to optimise investment potential. Jerry
  11. Where does he say this? . Page 36 'The British Bronze Penny 1860 to 1901' Jerry
  12. Never a mistake, but a 'learning experience'. And you would always get most of the money back 'on the Bay', but anyway its a nice looking coin, why worry? It is so difficult to tell from photos, may look great in the hand. Like that lovely Gothic Crown of yours; there is clearly very little expert agreement on this forum with the thoughts of one individual at CGS. Don't be disheartened! Not like the two and a half grand I spent repairing the daughters car last summer, only for her to sell it for £600 two weeks later because she 'didn't trust it'! AARGH........ Still, at least I've married her off now! Jerry
  13. Thanks all, I hope the finder reports them.... Jerry
  14. Hi all, these pics were posted following a detecting rally in my neck of the woods - South East Wales-this week-end, and purport to show two Saxon coins found by one individual. These would be a very rare find for this area, but I am suspicious of the style and condition, they look like modern fakes to me. What do you guys think? Fraudster trying to create a provenance, or remarkable (treasure) discovery? Jerry
  15. I bought that 1867, Richard, and the photos didnt do it justice, it has already featured on this forum. The marks were a waxy substance, easily flaked off with a cocktail stick . Look under ' more pennies' some time in August. Jerry
  16. An ' inverted 6' would look a lot like a 9, but an actual 9 would be so much more likely. Is there any difference in the shape of the digit that would cause them to deduce that it is an 'inverted 6'? Jerry
  17. I would call it 12.5 teeth. Must admit I'm not really into date breadth variation..............yet! Jerry
  18. FYO, I attach the images of the new obverse die taken from London Coins website, showing as Terry said that there were at least two (rather fragile) dies for this obverse. Also a close-up of the nape from this coin. I have not changed my view that there has been a minimal revision. Jerry
  19. 9 over 9, I would have said. Jerry
  20. Here is the F99 '8 over 8 that I bought today. Cost me £300, but probably not unreasonable as it is a 'published variety' and a single die, and got to be one of the better ones out there, good obverse lustre though duller reverse. Jerry
  21. I shall drop him a line directly, to see if I can arrange for him to examine the coin. Jerry
  22. Definitely an expensive 2 +D. Where have you been, jac? Missed all this exciting straight E 1902 and 145 tooth obverse 2 stuff! ? Jerry
  23. Got one, I think, my other is curved. But its not a difference I would go hunting for. Not like having extra teeth! Jerry
  24. How rare is this coin? I picked one up at the Midland Coin Fair recently, only about fine but only a couple of quid. But I know of one in near EF which might be available for a premium over the 'normal' 1880 price. How much of a premium do you penny guys think would be merited? I know Gouby only knew of one at the time of his 2009 publication, but how many of you guys have one? Jerry
  25. Liquid, it can easily be diluted in water and gives even coverage. Jerry
×
×
  • Create New...