terrysoldpennies

The 7 in the date, like the HT penny also lays over to the right , and is half a tooth narrower Terry

Sorry , but it looks to me like the 9 is the result of a die crack across the 9 into the exergue . you can see the blob of metal running down from above Terry

This penny was my mothers when she was collecting during the 1960s. She was a lawyer and had working connections with the banks , though I do not know where she obtained it ,but she must have obtained it around the time it was made . It shows no signs of any kind of coating , and even if my penny is a fake , the penny sold by London coins I assume was checked , if not £3500 ponds was a lot to pay for a dud Terry

I have an Uncirculated 1967 Proof or Speciman coin which was said to not exist . I mentioned it to MG, and he thought it might be worth perhaps £200. Then an EF-UNC was sold on L.Coins in December 14 for £3500. Proofs don't photo well , its the toned one Terry

Hi . as far as I an aware there is no difference in the legend on the two types of 1902 , but the tide height difference is easy to determine . The 1863 open 3 is not always easy to see. Terry

Hi Azda Your right about the high tide 1897 . but the sure way to tell is by the P in PENNY . The P on the Common type points to the tooth ,on the High Tide it points to the gap between the teeth Terry

Hi I'm Terry. I've been collecting mainly pre.dec. pennies for about a decade now. The collection was started by my mother in the 60s, and passed on to me . I have made quite a few discoveries, but have yet to share them . This one I think is the most important . At first glance it appears to be a Freeman 2 + d but no. What first caught my notice was the oversized colons with what appears to be a smaller button like dot in centre of all the colons, so I investigated further, and found the letters did not align with the teeth in the same way as other Freeman obv. 2 coins. Infact the V in VICTORIA and the F in F D point to the tooth. So I counted the teeth , and to my surprise was 145 , now the Freeman 2 has 143, and no other type has 145. I have only seen two others in three years of looking and they are both on London coins .

That's the kind of marks left after someone has clamped it in a vice Terry

It do's look like it is the same type in the first stage of breakdown, we'll have to keep looking for others at differing stages of deterioration Terry

P.s I would say the 1880 was the result of the Mint Re engraving the narrow date die rather than an error, though the filing of the old 8 digit must have started to come away. Curios that they re cut the die at all Terry

Hi. Matt . It's on the common Double exergue . I've Had this penny forever, and have never seen another , even like yours with the single error. Could you post the Pic. Terry

Hi. This 1940 penny has two obverse die letter faults, probably caused by part of the letters on the die breaking away. this perhaps could be the result of the Mint being less particular about the quality of the coins being produced , maybe due to the constraints of war. I'm not aware of any other penny with two such errors on one face. If you have one , I would love you to post it . Terry

Sorry I did'nt reply sooner , I've been out bowling this evening . In answer to you question Cliff , I read about it in an on line price guide a couple of years back, I cannot remember which. the Wavy and straight E,s can be found in closed 1903s, and in most years between 1897 and 1905. Pic. shows two 1900 pennies, with some degree of ware , and still seem to be clearly one or the other type , so the difference must be due to different dies, or ware to the dies Terry

Sorry, Don't know your name Nordle 11 . Its on A 6+g [J+g] Terry

They didn't seem to particular were they placed the last digit . look at this one Terry

This is one of my most interesting die crack coins , A piece of the penny almost the size of the Exergue is about to break away, leaving the line of the border teeth disjointed, and the second 2 enlarged. Terry

I see there's a lot of talk about the 1880 8 over 8 penny, but you could say its a story about two coins, the over date and the original penny with the narrow date that left the ghostly outline. Well I think this is that penny, as the position of the second 8 aligns correctly with the ghost 8. I have had this coin some time now, and have not seen another, even having scoured the net, and coin dealers. I've found nothing mention of it any where, but if it is listed shoot me. There's even more 1877 narrow dates to be found Terry

Terry

I have two 03 open 3s , one is straight, the other, possibly just slightly off straight. Seems they can vary slightly Terry

I heard of this variation on the bottom of the E's some years ago, and made a check on my spare 900 or so pennies of this period. I found that wavy and straight bottom E's can be found in all years from 1897 to 1905, with the exception of 1898, these all being of the wavy type, though it my be that I just did not find one. Also on the 1897 wavy, the bottoms of the stems of the P Y and the N's have a dimple. The two Rare types 1897 high tide, and the 1903 open 3 both have straight bottoms. Terry

Hi Jerry , I probably being dumb, but looking at your set of pictures I must say i'm not quite sure what you have noticed about the nape, could you clarify. I do noticed that the Knot on our coins is kind of half round where as most of the others it seem to form more of an oval shape. I wonder if this is two types of type 2 , with ours being one of them . Also I wonder if in the opinion of the penny collectors that this was a trial die, that was not adopted because it fell apart. I just wonder this as the cracks look terminal on all four known coins . If any member finds another it woud be great if you could post it, especially if it has no cracks. Terry

Looking at the F19 2+f the D in FD points to the right of the tooth , but on the F2 145 it's to the tooth if slightly to the left . Terry

Hi Jerry. to answer your question, The crack on your coin running through is the same as my penny and one of the other two found, but the one single example, has the crack running up along the neck and across the ear. And no I have not contacted Gouby about this find, though you my if you wish Terry

Hi it' Terry again . Thank's for the wecome . I made an error when I said the V in VICTORIA points to the tooth this should have been the A in VICTORIA, as no other type point directly at the tooth . My studies of the three coins of this type show that they were all poor pressings, and a lot of detail being lost in the hair, and also gives a larger bare patch at the bottom of the bust than the type 2. Also there is overstamping on the legend. The three coins all show a die crack almost right across the coin, but two have the same crack position, but the third has a crack just as long, but in a different place, suggesting there were at least two dies made, as they must have broken up shortly after. Its good to see that Jerry has found one, unless this is one of the two sold by London Coins, as this makes four. My straw poll of the numbers in relation to 2+ds is now about 80 to 3 or 4 , making them Ex. rare. Here is the reverse