mrbadexample

I think probably yes. When cataloging my farthings I lowered my opinion of the grade of quite a few of them. Have the coins changed? Nope. I never considered myself a generous grader either (although some of you on here are downright mean ) but the ability to see so much closer made me rethink. As for the penny, sorry, it's rather nice. As for the set, I'm still undecided. My initial reaction was a bit of panic, but I keep having another look. And another look.

It's an entirely valid point Ian. I have the technology to look much closer than ever before, and under the USB 'scope some of my collection looks like it should be in the bin. However, I can clearly see the marks on these coins using a 40x hand-held loupe, and on the wreath crown with the naked eye.

Sorry, Pete, didn't realise you wanted one too. I'll fish one out in a bit.

Ok, a few more questions if I may - this is a bit of a steep learning curve for me, and I don't want to be unfair to the seller if what I'm seeing is (at least mostly) die polishing. Unfortunately, I have no proof coins of a similar age to compare them to - the oldest I have is a 1950 penny received from Pete this morning. When I look at that through the USB 'scope I do see some hairlines. However, they are much fainter and fewer in number. I've attached a picture for comparison. Is the difference due to the different metals? Is the difference due to improved production techniques in 1950 over 1927? Does anyone have a silver proof of similar age that they could take a close up picture of for comparison?

I've added another 5 photos of the wreath crown. See what you think.

I think the worst are on F1, the florin, and WC2, the wreath crown. You say that the hairlines should be raised if it's die-polishing (which I confess, I am absolutely unfamiliar with) but I can't see that the lines are raised either under the loupe or the USB 'scope.

I covet it.

Well it arrived this morning. I can't say I'm entirely happy - everything seems to have been cleaned. Hopefully this link will work to a few photos: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxBRenK8v0n-SEVjZGhLRGZDRkk&usp=sharing So my next questions: would that be acceptable to you? Is is something I should expect? Having never spent over £100 (honestly!) on a numismatic item, I feel a bit out of my depth here.

It's another of those hammered pennies people here go on about.

Well if I'd been offered 3k for a coin I'd immediately put it on ebay with a 0 feedback account and hope to do better.

0 feedback. 1934 wreath crown. Would you bid? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/EXTREMELY-RARE-1934-KING-GEORGE-V-SILVER-WREATH-CROWN-Reasonable-Grade-/121903052893?

Deal!

One can but try, my friend! I'll be looking through the shrapnel tin before I bag it up to take to the bank, that's for sure.

Not just the second image, but the first too, from here: http://www.coinpeople.com/index.php/topic/24520-the-queen-victoria-thread/ post #18. I do like a bit of sport, me.

Nice one, I didn't know you could do that!

So I bid on it to take out the BIN option. Where's he nicked this pic from then eh?

But when I clicked on it it changed to this:

When I looked at his other items this 1862 was shown:

Ahh, insults. The last resort of a limited intellect. I can no longer report the listings since they've been taken down.

Funny how neither listing is still live if they're his. Would have been interesting to see how much the bidding ran up based on those photos, but not for the poor sod that bought them, of course.

Good article, thanks. Now I know what this dot to dot 10p is that people keep harping on about.

Thanks for the second opinion Colin. I'd get it on ebay as a rare, scarce, unlisted variety except it's my only fat 8.

Thanks Colin. It's missing the coppers though!

I can't see that it would be any different myself. Not something I would do.

I actually like the die crack better than the letters - it's the biggest I've seen. To me it's just defective, and not something I'd want (like many so-called "varieties" IMO).