Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'un-wreath the proofs!'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • British Coin forums
    • British Coin Related Discussions & Enquiries
    • Rotographic Publications Forum
  • Other Coin related forums
    • Beginners area
    • Free for all
    • Decimal Coins
    • Ancient Coins
    • Enquiries about Non British coins
  • For Sale or Wanted
    • Items For Sale
    • Wanted
  • Nothing whatsoever to do with coins area!
    • Forum technical help and support
    • Nothing whatsoever to do with coins area!

Product Groups

  • British/Irish Coins
  • Other Coins
  • Military

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End

Last Updated

  • Start

    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End

Group

Website URL

Location

Interests

Found 1 result

  1. VickySilver
    I just had a look at the upcoming Goldberg's catalogue, and was quite disappointed by the overall offerings, but more than this really have to question the three "VIP Record Proof" Wreaths dated 1928, 1932, and 1936. The latter looks perhaps the best, but the obverse of KG5 is very poorly struck in all three, the rims/edges just not there for proofs, and the reverse wreath details (i.e. stamens and flower details esp.) quite poor, at least to the accepted proofs that I have seen. I vote against all three, what say you dear readers? You may want to look at the Proof 65 1927 just prior in this auction or the 1936 I had posted [with help] earlier on these boards.
×