Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
George111

Elizabeth I id

Recommended Posts

Now I know this is not up to "standard" but I dug this out the ground ages ago and don't know what age or value ie shilling or crown? ect

Anybody help me ?

002 (640x480).jpg

004 (640x480).jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Elizabeth I Shilling, looks to be initial mark Escallop making this the Sixth Issue coinage and minted 1584-1586.

Nice find, and not often pierced for secondary use in this period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, HistoricCoinage said:

Elizabeth I Shilling, looks to be initial mark Escallop making this the Sixth Issue coinage and minted 1584-1586.

Nice find, and not often pierced for secondary use in this period.

Thanks for the info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The second coin is a 1580 sixpence of Eliz I, mm long cross.

Jerry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still believe the crosses so often scratched into the Elizabeth shillings were there to bring them into line with the new XII of later monarchs! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 3 lines do appear to be intentionally done

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not 100% sure but there maybe something scratched into it in the triangle maybe love token

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I might be seeing things but it looks like an A and M scratched into it in the triangle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one near the A of Elizabeth, well its not quite a true triangle seeing as one side is curved LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say it was a love token, personally. Great find, though! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it punctured and crossed because of her death and became none legal tender ?

Would love to know your theory's (thoughts)  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it would've been legal tender, right up to the recoinage in William III's reign.

After Elizabeth's reign all shillings were produced with XII in the fields, maybe to rectify the possible confusion that unmarked coins had had in Elizabeth's reign? So my theory is people began marking the 'unmarked' Elizabeth shillings with an X to ease identification, especially many decades later when people had gotten very much used to the XII coins. You have to remember, with clipping, worn sixpences, and unmarked Elizabeth groats, it probably wasn't easy for a lot of people.

Holed? My guess is a piece of jewellery, maybe contemporary? In the 17th century, as today, there was great respect for Elizabeth so, even though the coin was still valid currency at the time, it was starting to become an antique. An old hammered coin around your neck, when milled coinage was now the norm, which you could still spend in an emergency (a credit card), must have had appeal? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Coinery said:

An old hammered coin around your neck, when milled coinage was now the norm, which you could still spend in an emergency (a credit card), must have had appeal? :)

Nothing new with "Cash for Gold Silver" We have all sold the missus' jewelry when needs must :ph34r:   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Nutsaboutcoins said:

Nothing new with "Cash for Gold Silver" We have all sold the missus' jewelry when needs must :ph34r:   

Errr…. No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deffo looks like its had a "loop" or maybe string judging by the rubbing around the hole (ewer Mrs said in a Fankie Howard kind of way LOL)

I can see they needed to mark their coins or a mistake could be very costly     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×