1897 pennies

[PWA 1967 2,135]

I bought Lot 2520 in the last LCA.

Study group done by the seller.

I have now scanned the pages and if anyone is interested please PM your email address.

Although will be keeping the coins 

 

Pete.

[Nordle11 564]

Yes please  

[davidrj 194]

Me too, please 

David

 

[Nonmortuus 900]

Yes please

[Nordle11 564]

Thanks, had a brief flick through the scans, looks very interesting.

If David didn't already reveal his name, this would've given it away anyway 

[PWA 1967 2,135]

Not a problem.

Matt,Richard,David,Jon,Nons,John.

If anyone wants to put any of the pictures on the forum its not a problem and not a big deal.

Always happy to help collectors.

Pete.

[PWA 1967 2,135]

Someone just pointed out the PDF number may not match the coin.

A mate scanned them and the photos were numbered on the back and the coin flips.

Will mean you will have to look at them properly ,but easy to determin the variety.

Pete

[Bronze & Copper Collector 412]

Pm sent

[Prax 80]

2 hours ago, Bronze & Copper Collector said:

Pm sent

Ditto

[jelida 1,314]

And another, thanks Pete.

Jerry

[bhx7 222]

yes please Pete. . You have my email but can send it again of need. Thanks Brian

Edited March 17, 2016 by bhx7

[secret santa 2,325]

I've spent quite a bit of time trying to assign pictures to descriptions but am still not sure which is which. High tide and dot are OK - the rest look a bit ambiguous to me. Maybe someone else can post the relationship matrix ?

[davidrj 194]

1 hour ago, secret santa said:

I've spent quite a bit of time trying to assign pictures to descriptions but am still not sure which is which. High tide and dot are OK - the rest look a bit ambiguous to me. Maybe someone else can post the relationship matrix ?

That's as far as I've got so far, will report my findings, if any, tomorrow

David

[davidrj 194]

 

7 hours ago, secret santa said:

I've spent quite a bit of time trying to assign pictures to descriptions but am still not sure which is which. High tide and dot are OK - the rest look a bit ambiguous to me. Maybe someone else can post the relationship matrix ?

 

5 hours ago, davidrj said:

That's as far as I've got so far, will report my findings, if any, tomorrow

David

So here's coins 1 & 5 from Pete's pictures, corresponding to types 3 & 4

 

[davidrj 194]

Here are the remaining coins' dates for comparison, I've not yet matched these up with the reported types

I'll make a similar montage of the plumes and rocks later

[davidrj 194]

Helmets & plumes

[davidrj 194]

Best I can do with rocks

[davidrj 194]

Type descriptions NB type numbers are not the same as coin photo numbers

Far too late to try and work a matrix out, not convinced so far

David

[mrbadexample 1,006]

On 3/17/2016 at 0:52 PM, PWA 1967 said:

I have now scanned the pages and if anyone is interested please PM your email address.

Yes please Pete if you've got a minute.

[coinkat 21]

Thanks for posting- great information