Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
mrbadexample

1853 farthing - inverted Vs?

Recommended Posts

Greetings all.

I was picking up a few small purchases from ebay the other day, when I noticed one of the seller's other items was an 1853 copper farthing. Bit early for me, but since I'm broadening my horizons I thought I'd have a second glance. 

In CCGB there is a variety listed with inverted Vs for As in BRITANNIAR, £150 in VF. This is what it appeared to be, so I took a punt and it arrived this morning. I can't see any evidence of a bar to the As. So, have I got what I think?

 

 

1853 V for A (3).jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1853 V for A (2).jpg

1853 V for A.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the overall grade of the coin? The bars in the A's for these copper farthings were very prone to die fill. I'd be dubious with lower grade examples. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seller reckoned EF but nearer VF for me. Interesting what you say about the die fill, as most of the others I've looked at since don't seem to have the bar either, but I haven't got those in hand and under magnification.

DSCF7674.JPG

DSCF7675.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The As on the obverse are clear enough:

1853 V for A (4).jpg

1853 V for A (5).jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to be a common flaw for the series, I've seen it for quite a few years. Hopefully someone with a bit more experience may be able to give a second opinion. 

The obverse A's do look very clear, but could be a newer die?

It's a nice example by the way. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the whole I don't include these unless I get to see a high grade example where you can be 100% certain there is no trace of the horizontal bar. Many are either very faint, or you can see a bulge where the bar was connected. Then we end up in a position where we would be recording coins at varying stages in the process of the bar on the die becoming filled.

It is definitely an area that requires further study...if anyone wants to volunteer :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Colin G. said:

On the whole I don't include these unless I get to see a high grade example where you can be 100% certain there is no trace of the horizontal bar. Many are either very faint, or you can see a bulge where the bar was connected. Then we end up in a position where we would be recording coins at varying stages in the process of the bar on the die becoming filled.

It is definitely an area that requires further study...if anyone wants to volunteer :) 

Thanks Colin. I thought this was just a normal date, looked it up in CCGB for an approximate value and saw that the variety was listed. It appeared to fit the bill. After I'd bought it, I started looking at others and couldn't see very many that did appear to have the bar.

I could do with getting the muck out of the As. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×