1825 Farthing S over S variety?

[Hodgie 0]

Hi all, I've recently started collecting predecimal and acquired this 1825 farthing, and am wandering if this is an S over S minting error? Or could it be S over something else? (Also the fourth I appears lower than the other three but I believe that is quite common), any thoughts?

[Rob 3,152]

Reinforced legends seen on dies was a means of extending their life. Rubbish accumulates in the incuse parts leading to partly formed characters. Sometimes these are recut to give clear legend.

It is also possible for the initial character to be sunk in the wrong place and a correction made to the position.

Whatever the reason, this feature is frequently seen. Examination of the legends on first issue farthings will usually show partly formed letters implying the punches employed were not the best.

[Hodgie 0]

That is great to know, thank you for the swift reply!

[Rob 3,152]

No problem. If you want a real challenge, try to find an 1825 with cleanly punched and completely formed characters and the legend in alignment. It's a bit harder than you might imagine.

Edited March 5, 2017 by Rob

[RLC35 288]

39 minutes ago, Rob said:

No problem. If you want a real challenge, try to find an 1825 with cleanly punched and completely formed characters and the legend in alignment. It's a bit harder than you might imagine.

 

It is especially hard to find a 1825 farthing with a sharp, un-doubled "5" in the date. Almost all of them have a doubled 5, either higher or lower than the original 5! 

[Rob 3,152]

I would go further. Sometimes the 5 is triple cut

[Coinery 1,157]

Great close-up shot!

[Peter 615]

I hate all the b*llocks with overcut dates.They are the norm rather than rarities.You get some punters who think they have a unique coin.Come on Mr Goode...where is your book?

[Hodgie 0]

Speaking of sharp 5's I believe this may have one.