Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Citizen H

More cool junk

Recommended Posts

Redemption required, 

This (I hope) is the worse of the worse finished with, at least by todays offerings, 

the collecting? is to be honest must be the most un organised, random assembly of "why the heck did he get that!?!??!?"

entertainment ! 😁

so I think we have

1591 James VI (seen better days)

J758 George II VF

1571 Elizabeth I (knackered?)

please be gentle with me........

P1170879.JPG

P1170877.JPG

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention, I did notice the tudor rose to the right of the coins with the faces dated 1591 & the 1571,  interesting (for me as just only noticed) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hammered is not really my best subject, but the top one is Elizabeth I of England, not James VI of Scotland. Others will be better than me on the denominations.

The 1758 coin is a sixpence I believe. That and the shilling of the same date are probably the easiest of the George II silver coins to get hold of. Yours is a decent example.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, both are Elizabeth sixpences. The 1591 is mintmark Hand, and the other is mintmark Eglantine, which should date it 1573-1577. Your photos aren’t clear enough to see what’s going on with the last digit of the date, but it shouldn’t be 1571, as that would make it mintmark castle?

A clearer close up of the date and mintmark would be interesting.

edit: all three sixpences in the £15-£30 bracket

IMG_3748.jpeg

Edited by Coinery
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easily identifiable Tudor coins with readable legends and dates are certainly not junk! They are pieces of history and can be fascinating to beginners. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Coinery said:

edit: all three sixpences in the £15-£30 bracket

That is to say £15-£30ish each, not all three together :)

Top to bottom

£28-30

£20

£15-20

And as Sword says, not junk, rather a great bit of history.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Junk is 1960's pocket change 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a Figure of speech by me, "Cool Junk" I have many Items that I wouldn't part with and will be showing some items, 

I'm so interested in the coins that I have and how the heck was the coins trackable with so much going on? and really Many thanks for the help, 

I did get around to a close up of the 1571, hope fully this will help answer the question about the mint.

P1170884.thumb.JPG.20d5f253ec537c165f354eed3c076c0a.JPG     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Coinery said:

That is to say £15-£30ish each, not all three together :)

Top to bottom

£28-30

£20

£15-20

And as Sword says, not junk, rather a great bit of history.

Awesome, it probably would have been boot car finds in the early 1990's, a few £ each, oh and I also picked up a Human hand for £3.20p

Many thanks Stuart. I'm keeping a label with each of them so the next family member will at least be of interest for them.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A human hand ? - bet that came in handy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You did not make the film "Young frankenstein" did you ?

He had a massive swanstucker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×