Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Geordie582

Hammered Pennies

Recommended Posts

It has puzzled me for some time that while you find many hammered pennies with 'proof' or 'test' cuts made during their circulation, it appears that the mutilated penny was, seemingly, still acceptable even though the coin was worth less than its face value! Anyone any thoughts? :huh:

post-226-1160686564_thumb.jpg

post-226-1160686589_thumb.jpg

post-226-1160686614_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had one of those somewhere!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The metal these coins were struck on is not the best, I believe they broke quite frequently. I have more than a few of these myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it's a case of breaking, as the repeat of the same amount removed, but in different places around the coins, would seem to show deliberate intention. Different areas show different shapes to the cut, semi-circles, 'V' cuts, square cuts, etc. There are notes of testing coins in a number of publications and I have no problem with the need to prove a coin is not a base metal 'silvered' forgery, but it's the acceptance of the coin in later transactions that bothers me! :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't decide on this;

899306.jpg

Could be chipped off but looks a bit too neat, like it's been cut off.

Geordie have you some weighing apparatus? Are they underweight or correct weight? (That's not as daft as it sounds). Do all the cut ones weigh roughly the same?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My digital scale is only accurate to 0.1 grams so is no great shakes to detect that small a discrepency. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wanna do a deal on a 0.01g scale? I get them from the factory here in Merry old Deutschland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hm! Another coin or another scale.................No contest. I'll stick with this one!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't decide on this;

899306.jpg

Could be chipped off but looks a bit too neat, like it's been cut off.

Geordie have you some weighing apparatus? Are they underweight or correct weight? (That's not as daft as it sounds). Do all the cut ones weigh roughly the same?

Notice however that it broke off right at the beading, which given that the metal changes flow there, would account for the more even break. BTW nice Bristol penny, I wish I still had the one I owned.

Edited by scottishmoney

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first is an obvious break, but the second doesnt fit any of the criterion. Break or cut?

post-226-1160773132_thumb.jpg

post-226-1160773160_thumb.jpg

Edited by Geordie582

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind of makes you wonder if they were performing medieval torture on these coins, perhaps putting them in the 14th century equivalent of the rack. Or maybe they took the evil from them by breaking them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't answer that! but I do know that hammered pennies that have holes in them(for suspension not the deface kind) are usually for wearing as touch pieces against the malady of Scrofula (the King's disease)

Defacing was common to readily identify esterlings that may be of inferior metal (Below:- the first as touch peice, the second defaced.)

post-226-1160833127_thumb.jpg

post-226-1160833154_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A central hole in later hammered coins is also evidence that the coin was 'withdrawn' during recoinage (normally that during the reign of William III). In theory the coins were the supposed to be melted down and recoined but many seemed to escape the fate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Tom has a point there. I was going to make a comment about the fact that a hole in the coin in the centre is pretty pointless from a hanging round neck perspective.

However, quite useful for withdrawal purposes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×