medieval coin conditions

[scott 145]

was wondering on these, i bought an edward I london penny many years ago for £2, now the designs are crisp, but the one problem with it is there is a bit missing (about 1/5 of the text on the outer edge so not really intruding heavily onto the coin (about 1.5 CM at most from edge to central cross design, the coin itself is only half farthing size), now i bought this mostly because to get a coin of such age at that price was the only chance at the time to get a coint of that period into my collection, but was wondering where exactly the missing part places this in condition categorys, as i said the designs that are there are crisp, i am curious as to where to put this in condition and value.

[Geordie582 18]

All numismatists try to get coins that have the legend and bust/pattern intact. The perfectionists insist on as near flawless as possible otherwise known as unused. However others, like myself, prefer to have coins that show signs of being use for the purpose they were designed - financial transactions!

With hammered there are many factors that go toward the individual grade.With the likes of Henry II's Tealby issues, the silver was used in such thin blanks that mint'damage' was inevitable, though as the result was used, could you call the coin damaged? With the subsequent Plantagenets, the method of production, ie striking with hand tools, caused many variations so that condition is a moot point. An uncirculated Edward I coin could well be off centre or, through heavy strikes, cause pieces to fall off.

What I'm trying to say is that grading is a matter for personal assessment. I know that books and dealers offer 'certified grades' but threequarters of a rare coin is still rare! If you are thinking of selling the best way is to leave the grading to the purchaser. If it's for your own collection then be happy with your own assessment!

Ramble finished!!!

[scott 145]

well it is quite thin, might be strike damage as there is a letter there kinda sticks out, i do love it though, but is there any way of telling mint damage from regular damage?

[HistoricCoinage 160]

Scott,

Do you have any photos? It would be great if you did.

Kindest Regards,

Clive.