Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Recommended Posts

Got this from auction with all the other interesting pieces I have been showing here. On the packet it says "Edward IV" and "Durham"

Now someone is telling me this isn't Ed IV because he had no shillings.

Okay so who is it then?

514w7q.jpg

2s6xdg2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a word with Paul Withers at Galata who is one of the best experts in this field. He collects coin weights, writes about them and may have one of these too. In any case he would be able to point you in the right direction.

I see the mark is a cinquefoil, rose or pansy. This was also used as a mark in Henry VII, Henry VIII, Edward VI, Elizabeth I, James I and Charles I so there are numerous possibilities as to its origin. The alternative would be the use of the mark which is specific to a place. Besides the tower mint, York and Canterbury also used these marks at various times. The inscribed letter D could refer to the person in charge of the mint as opposed to the location. A precedent for this is a series of weights with a TR monogram which can reasonably be attributed to Oxford as Thomas Rawlins signed some medals with the same.

Edited by Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An article in the 2001 BNJ entitled "Coin-Weights made by the Founders" by Norman Biggs refers to the exact description of your piece. The article identifies it as a shilling coin weight (for assessing if the mass of silver is the same as found in a full shilling) but merely notes that some of the bullion weights have additional countermarks that raise interesting questions. It mentions a rampant lion, possibly to make it acceptable for use in Scotland. Other marks noted are a fleur de lys and a cinquefoil.

If a rampant lion was for Scotland, then the logical extension of this is a French lys and an English rose. French silver at this time was to a standard of 0.917 as opposed to the English 0.925. I don't know if this has any relevance though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I was getting smart-arses telling me that it can't be a Shilling because there were no shillings made during this reign.

Completely irrelevant, and proves they don't know jack sh*t. The moral of the tale: don't listen to smartarses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×