Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
1949threepence

Genuine lustre or a bit of polish ?

Recommended Posts

The light seems to bounce off it in a way it doesn't normally do with ordinary lustre.

Any thoughts guys ?

If genuine lustre, it's brilliant.

1878 penny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm ... this is the problems with buying on the basis of a photo. As we all know, changing the angle of the light can make a significant difference to a coin's appearance. And there's just nothing like seeing something 'in the hand'.

But as for this coin, well, I'm no expert on such coins and their 'mint' appearance. My only concern is the rim. Particularly near VICTORIA D: G: when you view the enlarged pic. See how there's a raised edge that catches the light?

It reminds me of one of the signs I use to identify good quality counterfeit £1 coins. Odd rims and an unusual appearance to the metal which I can best describe as 'glittery'. Rather like when you mix up metallic paint (or nail polish), the coins seem to have a lustre made up of particles. Difficult to describe but maybe you can see it in this pic. The coin itself is not (I believe) 'grainy; it's a characteristic of the metal alloy it's made from.

fake_1_pound_2.jpg

Of course, this could just be a very nice genuine coin!

Edited by TomGoodheart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tom.

I'm inclining to the POV that it's genuine lustre, as there appears to be almost no wear whatever. Of particular note is the shield, which looks well nigh perfect. Yet those produced between the latter part of 1861 and 1881, had a slightly convex shield which wore very readily.

Just wish I had the money this month to make a realistic bid for it.

(unless, of course, it's a fake. Where's Falmer Palmer when you need him :o ?)

Edited by 1949threepence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if it is genuine, I agree; it's a tremendous coin! No obvious bag knocks and pretty much as it would have been fresh from the mint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if it is genuine, I agree; it's a tremendous coin! No obvious bag knocks and pretty much as it would have been fresh from the mint.

That's the trouble. It looks almost too good to be true :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say a flash has been used (unless the table has lustre as well..)

Difficult to tell what's going on with a flash photo, bleaches everything as you know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to say that it looks and 'feels' genuine (with the proviso that there's no substitute for "in the hand"). Probably photo'd with flash, always tricky with lustre. But I see nothing suspicious about it, and I'm watching it ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too feel genuine, but there do look to be some issues with the cheek and I think with the flash that a bit of the contacts that would downgrade it are disguised. Will have a look at my own in an hour or two...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too feel genuine, but there do look to be some issues with the cheek and I think with the flash that a bit of the contacts that would downgrade it are disguised. Will have a look at my own in an hour or two...

I feel 90% certain that it's genuine but 10% of me says it could have been whizzed. Having bought a whizzed coin some years ago and I didn't realise until the thing started to tone a couple of years later, I'm always rather cautious about these things!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too feel genuine, but there do look to be some issues with the cheek and I think with the flash that a bit of the contacts that would downgrade it are disguised. Will have a look at my own in an hour or two...

I feel 90% certain that it's genuine but 10% of me says it could have been whizzed. Having bought a whizzed coin some years ago and I didn't realise until the thing started to tone a couple of years later, I'm always rather cautious about these things!

What exactly is 'whizzing'? I understand dipping polishing but not the technique of whizzing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too feel genuine, but there do look to be some issues with the cheek and I think with the flash that a bit of the contacts that would downgrade it are disguised. Will have a look at my own in an hour or two...

It's one of those you have to see in the hand before you can finally pass judgement.....and even then.....

I feel 90% certain that it's genuine but 10% of me says it could have been whizzed. Having bought a whizzed coin some years ago and I didn't realise until the thing started to tone a couple of years later, I'm always rather cautious about these things!

Yes ~ I mean how often do you see a bun penny, even in UNC, where the lustre is mint perfect. The coin would have had to be hermetically sealed for well over a century, surely ?

What exactly is 'whizzing'? I understand dipping polishing but not the technique of whizzing.

It's re-lustre-ing a coin ~ click here

Selected term: Buffing (whizzed)

Explanation: A polishing of a coin sometimes with an abrasive that leaves a finish that attempts to counterfeit mint luster. A buffed coin often is worth less than one that has not been cleaned

I've no idea how it's done, though. But I do have a coin which I think has been re-lustred. A silver one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as a quick addendum to the above, when azda showed us the 1875 coin below,at post No 65, on the rare bun penny thread, a few days ago, there was something about it which suggested, instinctively, that it was the real McCoy.

post-4682-12764269827_thumb.jpgpost-4682-127642699959_thumb.jpg

Yet that looks damn near perfect. Maybe just not quite as mirror like flawless as the 1878.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly is 'whizzing'? I understand dipping polishing but not the technique of whizzing.

As I understand it, it involves mechanically buffing the coin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am still hurting at selling that damn coin :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So did anyone bid on it and win? From 67 GBP in the last minute to 255 GBP

Edited by azda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So did anyone bid on it and win? From 67 GBP in the last minute to 255 GBP

Outbid. Too rich for me. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So did anyone bid on it and win?

Too much at 255, these come well struck with nice lustre (mine does look sim.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So did anyone bid on it and win? From 67 GBP in the last minute to 255 GBP

Outbid. Too rich for me. :(

No way. I'm skint for the rest of this month anyway, as far as coins are concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was gonna stick 75 GBP on it until i saw the last 30 seconds :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×