Accumulator Posted October 6, 2011 Posted October 6, 2011 There are actually collectors for those tedious 1937 varieties?? Funny how no-one talks about the two varieties of 1905, yet those are - despite not being earth-shatteringly riveting in themselves - way more interesting than those 1937s Having said that, some people probably feel the same way about 1953 farthings and would not understand my glee some years back at being offered a proof set which contained the 2+A. I paid a fair price ... for a 1953 proof set. It's only the proof 1937 1+B proof that I've found difficult. The differences in the two 1905 varieties are somewhat subtle, but whatever lights your fire Without help you could spend some time playing spot the difference! Here are my two: Quote
Peckris Posted October 6, 2011 Posted October 6, 2011 There are actually collectors for those tedious 1937 varieties?? Funny how no-one talks about the two varieties of 1905, yet those are - despite not being earth-shatteringly riveting in themselves - way more interesting than those 1937s Having said that, some people probably feel the same way about 1953 farthings and would not understand my glee some years back at being offered a proof set which contained the 2+A. I paid a fair price ... for a 1953 proof set. It's only the proof 1937 1+B proof that I've found difficult. The differences in the two 1905 varieties are somewhat subtle, but whatever lights your fire Without help you could spend some time playing spot the difference! Here are my two:To those who know, the difference is obvious!! But I still maintain that the difference is more significant than the 'bead/space' issue on the 1937... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.