Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
BigBear

It's getting harder!

Recommended Posts

This one is a lot harder for me as I know nothing !

It does feel heavier to me ?? slightly that is

The condition is clear to see thats why I am lost

post-32-1088625625_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If in doubt say Henry VI, firstly you say it's heavier and that important cos it means it was produced between Edward III and the first part of Edward IV's reign. Henry VI ones are quite common so lets have a look there, if not there than under Edward III equally common. If that fails then we'll look under Richard II and Henry V... If that fails then we'll get to that if we have to...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right it's not Henry V or VI, the bust isn't right for those...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it's Richard II... Most probably Edward III

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look on the obverse side where the king's byust is, to the bottom left if you can read the legend tell me if there is a z there...

From directly below the king's bust it should read something like... ANGL then what does it read?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh i know it's ANGL, it's just i can't see a z or not, that is important... i think i now what it might be... well i have a chouice between a few but i need to know if there is any z there...

Actually just check this one... S.1566

After the ANGL is there what looks like a random placed 1 that looks a bit homeless?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still not sure about this one though cos if you see here can you see a mintmark, this is kind of like Henry VI?

Right i've done a bit of circling... the one on the left, what letter is that?

The one on the right, what is that? (See if it looks like any mintmarks in the Spinks table)

post-32-1088628677_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah i was looking at that... (i've just removed that post cos of Chris' bandwith it was a bit big!)

My picture with the terrible circles shows it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the letter to the right of it looks like an F for FRANC.

The letter before looks like the the L from ANGL...

But that sure doesn't look like a Z does it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks similar to a pre-treaty groat series C (London ) in the Circular - S 1565, if that helps...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be a back to front F actually, and the other letter to the right an R or a D... which would fit in with the Edward III Post treaty coins, have a look at S.1637

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's even got the inverse n in London on the reverse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But this has the annulet stops of the pre treaty coin whereas S1637 has cross stops whic come in during the transitional period no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're most probably right it's getting late and i'm getting confused. So is it in actual fact what i said it was the first time around? :unsure:

I'm having a tough time with this one! :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is it S.1566?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Er... yes. I think. Though I'm still struggling with the difference between 1565 (whihc I have a photo of ) and 1566 (which I don't). I'd go for your classification on the basis that it was more 'scientifically' derived whereas mine is just on the basis of a few pictures!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh .. and well done!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope we haven't scared Big Bear off!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - just a bit carried away! So is the rest early hammered too? ( ie no Charles I, my particular interest!!)

(Looks like a nice collection by the way!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 others that are half groats or pennies, the rest of the collection are later milled coins and even I can find them in the books!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×