Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Mongo

The Queens Diamond Jubilee...

Recommended Posts

vlgs6.jpg Couldn't resist, made me chuckle! sorry. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

vlgs6.jpg Couldn't resist, made me chuckle! sorry. :)

:lol:

"One is doing a Number Two. When One does a One, the corgis get a drink."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, that one has been doing the rounds on Facebook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, that one has been doing the rounds on Facebook

I saw that on faeces book ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, that one has been doing the rounds on Facebook

I saw that on faeces book ;)

Same thing I believe Peter, a total load of shite :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im always the last to get the jokes! I do not do the facebook thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't resist buying a pound shop plate with commemorating the Diamond Jubilee of "HRH Queen Elizabeth II". I didn't know she had been demoted...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't resist buying a pound shop plate with commemorating the Diamond Jubilee of "HRH Queen Elizabeth II". I didn't know she had been demoted...

What did you expect for a quid? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neat picture, Mongo !!!

All respect to the Queen, though. She's not put a foot wrong in 60 years. An amazing feat for someone in the public eye.

What I want to know is, why, when she's 86 years old, she doen't even look 50 on her banknote portrait :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All respect to the Queen, though. She's not put a foot wrong in 60 years. An amazing feat for someone in the public eye.

Not a great monarchist, but I'm coming round to the view that a hereditry lottery is a good a way as anyof picking a titular Head of State.

definitely wouldn't want a Predident Thatcher or a President Blair.

The Irish probably have it about right

Still hope those celebrating today have a good time and don't get too cold and wet

Is this what they mean when they sing "Long to rain over us"?

:)

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neat picture, Mongo !!!

All respect to the Queen, though. She's not put a foot wrong in 60 years. An amazing feat for someone in the public eye.

What I want to know is, why, when she's 86 years old, she doen't even look 50 on her banknote portrait :ph34r:

Victoria at 68:

Victoriaat68.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Monarchy is unique.

Why should we throw away centuries of tradition?

There are very few of our coins without the monarch on them.yance

I'm quite happy to go along with the pomp and circumstance. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All respect to the Queen, though. She's not put a foot wrong in 60 years. An amazing feat for someone in the public eye.

Not a great monarchist, but I'm coming round to the view that a hereditry lottery is a good a way as anyof picking a titular Head of State.

definitely wouldn't want a Predident Thatcher or a President Blair.

The Irish probably have it about right

Still hope those celebrating today have a good time and don't get too cold and wet

Is this what they mean when they sing "Long to rain over us"?

:)

David

That long to rain over us joke is certainly doing the rounds :D

Presumably only women can be titular heads of state? Men - especially Cameron - would just be knobs, I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Monarchy is unique.

Why should we throw away centuries of tradition?

There are very few of our coins without the monarch on them.yance

I'm quite happy to go along with the pomp and circumstance. :)

Very good thing. Can you imagine coins in circulation with the heads of Heath, Wilson, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown & Cameron on them ? Not a nice thought.

That long to rain over us joke is certainly doing the rounds :D

Presumably only women can be titular heads of state? Men - especially Cameron - would just be knobs, I guess.

Just so. He certainly fits the bill on that score B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Monarchy is unique.

Why should we throw away centuries of tradition?

There are very few of our coins without the monarch on them.yance

I'm quite happy to go along with the pomp and circumstance. :)

Very good thing. Can you imagine coins in circulation with the heads of Heath, Wilson, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown & Cameron on them ? Not a nice thought.

That long to rain over us joke is certainly doing the rounds :D

Presumably only women can be titular heads of state? Men - especially Cameron - would just be knobs, I guess.

Just so. He certainly fits the bill on that score B)

Pity he doesn't have the Opposition Chancellor to keep him company.. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Monarchy is unique.

Why should we throw away centuries of tradition?

There are very few of our coins without the monarch on them.yance

I'm quite happy to go along with the pomp and circumstance. :)

I agree, Peter. It's been a fantastic weekend of celebrations for a diamond queen. Talking about facebook here is a status from a friend of mine in the U.S

"Watching the Diamond Jubilee makes me wish we had never made that huge mistake in 1776" ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Monarchy is unique.

Why should we throw away centuries of tradition?

There are very few of our coins without the monarch on them.yance

I'm quite happy to go along with the pomp and circumstance. :)

I agree, Peter. It's been a fantastic weekend of celebrations for a diamond queen. Talking about facebook here is a status from a friend of mine in the U.S

"Watching the Diamond Jubilee makes me wish we had never made that huge mistake in 1776" ...

Not as serious as that huge mistake they made in 2000 :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This all brings a very good question. I've been thinking recently, when will she step down, My conclusion is she wants to beat Victoria as longest serving Monarch. Anyone else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This all brings a very good question. I've been thinking recently, when will she step down, My conclusion is she wants to beat Victoria as longest serving Monarch. Anyone else?

I can not see her stepping down, unless it is for health reasons. I think she will definitely become the longest serving monarch... I bet the royal mint is already making some rubbish to sell us as a celebration!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it just coincidence the top three Monarchs this country has had have been women?

Elizabeth

Victoria

Elizabeth 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

George III 60 years. Lizabeth I 45 years, so not quite

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

George III 60 years. Lizabeth I 45 years, so not quite

I meant in my estimation.....not in years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This all brings a very good question. I've been thinking recently, when will she step down, My conclusion is she wants to beat Victoria as longest serving Monarch. Anyone else?

I agree. In fact, I don't see her stepping down at all, unless for health reasons.

George III 60 years. Lizabeth I 45 years, so not quite

George III actually died in 1799 but the fact was successfully concealed from the public. It was felt that having George IV that early would have precipitated a revolution so it didn't come to pass until he was too fat and dissolute for anyone to care very much. If you look at the portraits of George III from 1816, it's actually his son, quite clearly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

George III actually died in 1799 but the fact was successfully concealed from the public. It was felt that having George IV that early would have precipitated a revolution so it didn't come to pass until he was too fat and dissolute for anyone to care very much. If you look at the portraits of George III from 1816, it's actually his son, quite clearly.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This all brings a very good question. I've been thinking recently, when will she step down, My conclusion is she wants to beat Victoria as longest serving Monarch. Anyone else?

I agree, and if she makes it to 10th September 2015, she will have achieved that, and beaten Victoria's reign.

Just 3 years and 3 months away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×