Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Debbie

Directions which the king/ queen face

Recommended Posts

I was always under the impression that each time a new king or queen took over the direction they faced on the coinage changed. I noticed that George V, Edward VIII and George VI all face the same way. ? :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was always under the impression that each time a new king or queen took over the direction they faced on the coinage changed. I noticed that George V, Edward VIII and George VI all face the same way. ? :huh:

Edward the VIII did'nt like to conform to tradition, if you look at George VI, he also faces the same way

Edited by azda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Charles II faced both directions in gold and silver! As did James II on his tin coinage!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was always under the impression that each time a new king or queen took over the direction they faced on the coinage changed. I noticed that George V, Edward VIII and George VI all face the same way. ? :huh:

Edward VIII's face was not particularly symmetrical and he didn't like the side that should have shown on the coins - so he faced the other way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was always under the impression that each time a new king or queen took over the direction they faced on the coinage changed. I noticed that George V, Edward VIII and George VI all face the same way. ? :huh:

Edward VIII's face was not particularly symmetrical and he didn't like the side that should have shown on the coins - so he faced the other way.

Yes, Edward VIII was extremely vain. This even superseded his political leanings, which would have made the correct right-facing portrait far more appropriate. :rolleyes: George VI simply restored the natural sequence as if his brother had faced the proper way. Interestingly, the Abdication was so late in the year that the issue of 1937 George VI coins must have been a very rushed job. This can be seen in an almost unchanged portrait, and reverse designs that were more often identical than not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if Charles will have his portrait head on? It would be interesting if he did although have no evidence to suppose he would. Now that would be a much older tradition...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that interesting info chaps, that's something else I didn't know.I don't think I would be able to tell the difference between the two portraits of EdVIII and George V1 - apart from that Edwards nose looks slightly more dipped.

I'm sure Charles will keep to the tradition and definately in profile! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I wonder is if Charles will keep his name and be Charles III or whether he will change it to something with better history. So will we see George VII? Or perhaps Edward IX? Or William V?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I wonder is if Charles will keep his name and be Charles III or whether he will change it to something with better history. So will we see George VII? Or perhaps Edward IX? Or William V?

I think he will be Neddy Seagoon the First :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if Charles will have his portrait head on? It would be interesting if he did although have no evidence to suppose he would. Now that would be a much older tradition...

They'd have to increase the size of the coins to accommodate his ears.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I wonder is if Charles will keep his name and be Charles III or whether he will change it to something with better history. So will we see George VII? Or perhaps Edward IX? Or William V?

He is on record as saying he wants to be George VII.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I wonder is if Charles will keep his name and be Charles III or whether he will change it to something with better history. So will we see George VII? Or perhaps Edward IX? Or William V?

He is on record as saying he wants to be George VII.

...with Camilla as Min, William as Griptype-Thynne, and Harry as Eccles :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Inasmuch as the monarchy is a phenomenal tradition, I do believe amends must be made to skip a generation or otherwise just insure that the interregnum will be duly brief betwixt the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and King William V.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Inasmuch as the monarchy is a phenomenal tradition, I do believe amends must be made to skip a generation or otherwise just insure that the interregnum will be duly brief betwixt the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and King William V.

Good job you're in the Ukraine, or you could find yourself in the Tower for an insurrectionary remark like that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good job you're in the Ukraine, or you could find yourself in the Tower for an insurrectionary remark like that!

"The" Ukraine is an insurrectionary comment in Ukraine - only pro-Russian uses the article "the". I remember a few years ago, my mother in law got chewed out for saying that. It is okay to speak Russian, we all do in UA, but never say it like "the" Ukraine.

At least I have the highest respects for Her Majesty, just not her firstborn. I will stay out like the plaque whence Charles becomes monarch. If he were a long reign, I foresee the final dismantling of a long and formidable monarchy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good job you're in the Ukraine, or you could find yourself in the Tower for an insurrectionary remark like that!

"The" Ukraine is an insurrectionary comment in Ukraine - only pro-Russian uses the article "the". I remember a few years ago, my mother in law got chewed out for saying that. It is okay to speak Russian, we all do in UA, but never say it like "the" Ukraine.

At least I have the highest respects for Her Majesty, just not her firstborn. I will stay out like the plaque whence Charles becomes monarch. If he were a long reign, I foresee the final dismantling of a long and formidable monarchy.

Hardly likely, given his current age! The words "Edward" and "VII" come to mind for some reason. Mind you, I don't share your antipathy - much as I admire Her Maj, a Goons-loving, environmentally-caring, plant-talking, Camilla-marrying gonk might be quite fun for a year or two :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardly likely, given his current age! The words "Edward" and "VII" come to mind for some reason. Mind you, I don't share your antipathy - much as I admire Her Maj, a Goons-loving, environmentally-caring, plant-talking, Camilla-marrying gonk might be quite fun for a year or two :P

Surely will be good for the Tabloids. But then again, George VII might could get upset and shutter them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardly likely, given his current age! The words "Edward" and "VII" come to mind for some reason. Mind you, I don't share your antipathy - much as I admire Her Maj, a Goons-loving, environmentally-caring, plant-talking, Camilla-marrying gonk might be quite fun for a year or two :P

Surely will be good for the Tabloids. But then again, George VII might could get upset and shutter them.

Wow. A Battle Royal between George VII and Rupert Murdoch. Now that I'd pay good money to see!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing there won't be is an interegnum. The Queen is dead.Long live the King.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing there won't be is an interegnum. The Queen is dead.Long live the King.

There was that brief interregnum betwixt the reigns of GV and GVI, aka Walli's husband. Canna say they really reigned. Wasn't even coronated, in fact GVI was coronated when EVIII was supposed to have been.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing there won't be is an interegnum. The Queen is dead.Long live the King.

There was that brief interregnum betwixt the reigns of GV and GVI, aka Walli's husband. Canna say they really reigned. Wasn't even coronated, in fact GVI was coronated when EVIII was supposed to have been.

Hmm, if you only count a reign from the coronation, then Her Maj's Diamond Jubbly is not until NEXT year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing there won't be is an interegnum. The Queen is dead.Long live the King.

There was that brief interregnum betwixt the reigns of GV and GVI, aka Walli's husband. Canna say they really reigned. Wasn't even coronated, in fact GVI was coronated when EVIII was supposed to have been.

Hmm, if you only count a reign from the coronation, then Her Maj's Diamond Jubbly is not until NEXT year!

And Edward VIII reigned - just look at the stamps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Edward VIII reigned - just look at the stamps

And mercifully short for the monarchists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Off with all your heads B) Lets get back to real monarchy and get rid of these pesky politicians :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×