Liz 1 grading

[Peter 615]

Look at this listing and give your opinion on grade.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Wonderful-1562-Elizabeth1-silver-6d-Sixpence-/221079180456?pt=UK_Coins_BritishHammered_RL&hash=item33795894a8#ht_752wt_1270

It is a nicely rounded.

The bust always wears quickly.

I would give it NF/Poor

[azda 979]

Look at this listing and give your opinion on grade.

http://www.ebay.co.u...8#ht_752wt_1270

It is a nicely rounded.

The bust always wears quickly.

I would give it NF/Poor

I'd go the opposite way round Peter, Poor/NF

[Peckris 579]

Look at this listing and give your opinion on grade.

http://www.ebay.co.u...8#ht_752wt_1270

It is a nicely rounded.

The bust always wears quickly.

I would give it NF/Poor

I'd go the opposite way round Peter, Poor/NF

I think Peter has graded according to how the images are displayed in eBay - reverse first. I agree about the grades, but I would add that it is only the portrait that is Poor, the legend is also NF. How that would affect the overall grade, I haven't the faintest idea. Perhaps "NF, portrait Poor"?

[Peter 615]

Why ANYONE would think this is GF/VF

[Coinery 1,157]

Look at this listing and give your opinion on grade.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Wonderful-1562-Elizabeth1-silver-6d-Sixpence-/221079180456?pt=UK_Coins_BritishHammered_RL&hash=item33795894a8#ht_752wt_1270

It is a nicely rounded.

The bust always wears quickly.

I would give it NF/Poor

I'd be a little kinder and say the reverse is fine. The obverse is poor/near fine (I'm wondering whether that's a weak strike, which is holding me back). However I take it down a notch for that aweful patchy tone (I would've shied away from buying it altogether with that 'tone,' on account I've previously had a couple with this 'patchiness' which weren't right)! Lovely round flan though!