Coins of England 2013

[Nick 329]

Received my copy of the new 2013 Spink catalogue today. The foreword contains a couple of pieces of interesting information: they are currently compiling information for a new edition of English Silver Coinage since 1649; and the splitting of the decimal section from the catalogue will occur next year.

[Peter 615]

Received my copy of the new 2013 Spink catalogue today. The foreword contains a couple of pieces of interesting information: they are currently compiling information for a new edition of English Silver Coinage since 1649; and the splitting of the decimal section from the catalogue will occur next year.

That will be interesting for Rob (unless he is involved)

[Gary D 76]

Received my copy of the new 2013 Spink catalogue today. The foreword contains a couple of pieces of interesting information: they are currently compiling information for a new edition of English Silver Coinage since 1649; and the splitting of the decimal section from the catalogue will occur next year.

That will be interesting for Rob (unless he is involved)

And when they split the hammered away we will be getting somewhere.

[VickySilver 830]

Amen! I was not favoring the 2012 edition and felt many of the milled values to be off. What was your impression of Victorian copper and silver?

[Coinery 1,152]

Received my copy of the new 2013 Spink catalogue today. The foreword contains a couple of pieces of interesting information: they are currently compiling information for a new edition of English Silver Coinage since 1649; and the splitting of the decimal section from the catalogue will occur next year.

That will be interesting for Rob (unless he is involved)

And when they split the hammered away we will be getting somewhere.

As long as they don't sub-divide the hammered section further! We don't want everyone knowing which of the coins within a Spink number cataloging are the rare ones! Heaven forbid!

[Coinery 1,152]

Received my copy of the new 2013 Spink catalogue today. The foreword contains a couple of pieces of interesting information: they are currently compiling information for a new edition of English Silver Coinage since 1649; and the splitting of the decimal section from the catalogue will occur next year.

Does it still have 'no stop after DEI' in S3516?

[Peter 615]

Just ordered my copy.

My last one was 2010.

A bit of Xmas reading.

They could easily sell pre milled,milled and post decimal versions.

[Nick 329]

Received my copy of the new 2013 Spink catalogue today. The foreword contains a couple of pieces of interesting information: they are currently compiling information for a new edition of English Silver Coinage since 1649; and the splitting of the decimal section from the catalogue will occur next year.

Does it still have 'no stop after DEI' in S3516?

Yes. The items within 3516 are unchanged, albeit the prices a little higher.

[Peckris 579]

Received my copy of the new 2013 Spink catalogue today. The foreword contains a couple of pieces of interesting information: they are currently compiling information for a new edition of English Silver Coinage since 1649; and the splitting of the decimal section from the catalogue will occur next year.

Does it still have 'no stop after DEI' in S3516?

Yes. The items within 3516 are unchanged, albeit the prices a little higher.

So we will lose a quarter of the book, for which they will probably reduce the price by £1

[Coinery 1,152]

Received my copy of the new 2013 Spink catalogue today. The foreword contains a couple of pieces of interesting information: they are currently compiling information for a new edition of English Silver Coinage since 1649; and the splitting of the decimal section from the catalogue will occur next year.

Does it still have 'no stop after DEI' in S3516?

Yes. The items within 3516 are unchanged, albeit the prices a little higher.

Thanks, Nick.

Doesn't quite tally with an email I had from spink's a couple of months back, but hey ho!

[pokal02 44]

Does anyone else think the first groat illustrated under Henry VIII Posthumous isn't Posthumous? It has Lombardic lettering & Lis mintmark (can't distinguish the stops easily - could be saltires, trefoils or saltire crosses?)