Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
Coinery

CGS and Verd...Sorry!

Recommended Posts

PCGS65 specimen - much better mirror and colour than picture shows though.

IMG_0210.jpg

NGC65 specimen - also better mirror and "color" than picture shows

IMG_0211.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't even try and distinguish between Davies Dull and Bright. And this from a man who likes his microvarieties. Now if only there was a pointing, I'd be interested...

The dull/bright distinction is about as difficult to spot as the smaller/larger reverse design in the G5 series.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ex-Spink garbled edge 0.925 proof reverse

IMG_0206.jpg

Another raised edge proof reverse

IMG_0208.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a raised edge proof finishing on the Bay at 7-ish tonight if anyone is interested:

http://www.ebay.co.u...=item23287e00ce

That rim by the date might be damage?

Nope, thankfully just oxidation; nice coin overall as were it's mates - I tried to pick out decent ones but was more interested to get the inferior CGS specimen just for comparo & sad to see its getting worse with time as one would think.

Edited by VickySilver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a raised edge proof finishing on the Bay at 7-ish tonight if anyone is interested:

http://www.ebay.co.u...=item23287e00ce

That rim by the date might be damage?

Nope, thankfully just oxidation; nice coin overall as were it's mates - I tried to pick out decent ones but was more interested to get the inferior CGS specimen just for comparo & sad to see its getting worse with time as one would think.

Was referring to the eBay link by Paulus! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a raised edge proof finishing on the Bay at 7-ish tonight if anyone is interested:

http://www.ebay.co.u...=item23287e00ce

That rim by the date might be damage?

Nope, thankfully just oxidation; nice coin overall as were it's mates - I tried to pick out decent ones but was more interested to get the inferior CGS specimen just for comparo & sad to see its getting worse with time as one would think.

Was referring to the eBay link by Paulus! ;)

I did think it looked a little 'edgy', not interested in owning one myself ... it went for £406 ... mind you, I would be very proud if I owned the one Dave has just acquired! How the smeg do you get pictures like that (Dave Azda's) anyway??

Edited by Paulus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, any last guesses? Hint: its a specimen and grade number higher than guessed so far....Will try for closeup later today. I too have a proof infuse edge tho not sure if .500 or .925.

I've been wondering about cracking it out and what to do, the verd almost looks as though a particle is in the slab and then began the spots.

The face, leg detail and blanket binding all looks less than perfect to me. Not that I know anything about milled coin grading , but VF ish? Whatever average number that might be. High 50s?

You can definitely buckle THAT boot up! Where's that one for sale, see if I can't beat Dave in the CGS League Tables? :P

It went for $3000 at Heritage a couple of months ago. It's also supposedly one of the .925 silver proofs. Funny, I thought all the raised edge proofs were .925 silver.

I emailed them just before the auction and it was a raised edge proof. Top pop hence the stupid price.

Re the 0.925 incuse, according to Davies it has a slightly different reverse, sword to gap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But the proof incuse 0.500 has the same characteristics as the 0.925 incuse?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But the proof incuse 0.500 has the same characteristics as the 0.925 incuse?

Evaluating the specific gravity for each would tell them apart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, the sp. gr. is very close as I recall. If you do that bit with weighing the displaced water & all as I remember...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, the sp. gr. is very close as I recall. If you do that bit with weighing the displaced water & all as I remember...

You'd need an accurate set of scales but the specific gravities are far enough apart to be able to work out which is which.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, the sp. gr. is very close as I recall. If you do that bit with weighing the displaced water & all as I remember...

You'd need an accurate set of scales but the specific gravities are far enough apart to be able to work out which is which.

If you tap it gently with a rench you should be able tell from the ring. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But the proof incuse 0.500 has the same characteristics as the 0.925 incuse?

The 0.500 has the sword pointing to a tooth like the regular crowns

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×